Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20959099›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

RNA polymerase II with open and closed trigger loops: active site dynamics and nucleic acid translocation.

Michael Feig, Zachary F Burton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II substrate binding and metal coordination using a free-electron laser.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Regulation of Transcript Elongation.Annual review of microbiology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael FeigDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. feig@msu.edu
Zachary F Burton

Funding

Multiscale modeling of supramolecular protein-DNA assembliesR01GM092949 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FEIG, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2013
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 092949NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA polymerase II is the central eukaryotic enzyme in transcription from DNA to RNA. The dynamics of RNA polymerase II is described from molecular-dynamics simulations started from two crystal structures with open and closed trigger loop (TL) forms. Dynamic transitions between neutral and forward translocated states were observed, especially for the downstream DNA duplex. Dynamic rearrangements were also seen in the active site environment, including conformations in which the active site nucleotide assumed a possibly precatalytic conformation in close proximity to the terminal 3'-hydroxyl of the nascent RNA. Because nucleic acid translocation was observed primarily in the simulations with an open TL structure, whereas close approach of the active site nucleotide to the terminal RNA ribose predominantly occurred in the closed TL structure, a modified Brownian ratchet mechanism is proposed whereby thermally driven translocation is only possible with an open TL, and fidelity control and catalysis require TL closing.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainMolecular Dynamics SimulationMovementBiocatalysisDNANucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiaeSolventsDNARNARNA Polymerase IISolvents

Identifiers

PMID20959099
PMCPMC2956212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.