Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20959004›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2010

Characterization of human adenovirus 35 and derivation of complex vectors.

Duncan McVey, Mohammed Zuber, Damodar Ettyreddy, Christopher D Reiter, Douglas E Brough, Gary J Nabel, C Richter King, Jason G D Gall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Duncan McVeyDepartment of Research, GenVec, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD 20874, USA.
Mohammed Zuber
Damodar Ettyreddy
Christopher D Reiter
Douglas E Brough
Gary J Nabel
C Richter King
Jason G D Gall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReplication-deficient recombinant adenoviral vectors based on human serotype 35 (Ad35) are desirable due to the relatively low prevalence of neutralizing antibodies in the human population. The structure of the viral genome and life cycle of Ad35 differs from the better characterized Ad5 and these differences require differences in the strategies for the generation of vectors for gene delivery.

resultsSequences essential for E1 and E4 function were identified and removed and the effects of the deletions on viral gene transcription were determined. In addition, the non-essential E3 region was deleted from rAd35 vectors and a sequence was found that did not have an effect on viability but reduced viral fitness. The packaging capacity of rAd35 was dependent on pIX and vectors were generated with stable genome sizes of up to 104% of the wild type genome size. These data were used to make an E1-, E3-, E4-deleted rAd35 vector. This rAd35 vector with multiple gene deletions has the advantages of multiple blocks to viral replication (i.e., E1 and E4 deletions) and a transgene packaging capacity of 7.6 Kb, comparable to rAd5 vectors.

conclusionsThe results reported here allow the generation of larger capacity rAd35 vectors and will guide the derivation of adenovirus vectors from other serotypes.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsTranscription, GeneticVirus ReplicationAdenovirus E1 ProteinsAdenovirus E3 ProteinsAdenovirus E4 ProteinsAdenoviruses, HumanGene DeletionGenetic TherapyGenome, ViralHumansMicrobial ViabilityVirus AssemblyAdenovirus E1 ProteinsAdenovirus E3 ProteinsAdenovirus E4 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20959004
PMCPMC2984591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.