Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20957095›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2010

Materials for pharmaceutical dosage forms: molecular pharmaceutics and controlled release drug delivery aspects.

Heidi M Mansour, Minji Sohn, Abeer Al-Ghananeem, Patrick P Deluca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Polymeric (Poly(lactic-ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Virus-like Particles: Fundamentals and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heidi M MansourDivision of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; E-Mails: minjisohn@uky.edu (M.S.); amalg0@email.uky.edu (A.A.-G.); ppdelu1@email.uky.edu (P.P.D).
Minji Sohn
Abeer Al-Ghananeem
Patrick P Deluca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled release delivery is available for many routes of administration and offers many advantages (as microparticles and nanoparticles) over immediate release delivery. These advantages include reduced dosing frequency, better therapeutic control, fewer side effects, and, consequently, these dosage forms are well accepted by patients. Advances in polymer material science, particle engineering design, manufacture, and nanotechnology have led the way to the introduction of several marketed controlled release products and several more are in pre-clinical and clinical development.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBiodegradable PlasticsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersBiocompatible MaterialsBiodegradable PlasticsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Carriersbiodegradablebiomaterialscopolymersmanufacturemicroparticlenanoparticleparticle engineering designpharmaceutical dosage formspolymers

Identifiers

PMID20957095
PMCPMC2956096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.