ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2010
Communication between patients and providers and informed decision making.
Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preference Does Not Match Use: A Pilot Study of Data Visualization Format and Cancer Risk Comprehension Across Educational Levels.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- What Information on Mammographic Screening is Available to Women in Quebec, Ontario and Canada: Results from a Document Analysis.Public health ethics · 2026Article
- Age and race/ethnicity differences in decisional conflict in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Article
- The Impact of Dementia on Cancer Treatment Decision-Making, Cancer Treatment, and Mortality: A Mixed Studies Review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021Review
- Understanding the Factors Influencing Older Adults' Decision-Making about Their Use of Over-The-Counter Medications-A Scenario-Based Approach.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Review
- Information needs, communication and usage of social media by cancer patients and their relatives.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Article
- Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and treatment regret among Latinas and non-Latina whites with DCIS.Patient education and counseling · 2014Article
- A phoenix rising: who considers herself a "survivor" after a diagnosis of breast cancer?Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2012Article
- Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making: report from an American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute workshop.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) need to comprehend the meaning of the diagnosis and the potential benefits and harms of treatment options. Full and understandable information is a requirement, not an option. However, with DCIS, as with many areas of medicine, a high level of uncertainty about the disease remains. In this article, we define informed medical decision making, review challenges to its implementation, and provide suggestions on how to improve communication with women about the diagnosis and treatment of DCIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.