Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20956346›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2010

Major differences in the responses of primary human leukocyte subsets to IFN-beta.

Anette H H van Boxel-Dezaire, Joana A Zula, Yaomin Xu, Richard M Ransohoff, James W Jacobberger, George R Stark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MITD1 is a brain-specific interferon-inducible factor that inhibits flavivirus replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of IFN-α in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Roles of Infection in Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Responses to Cytokines and Interferons that Depend upon JAKs and STATs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anette H H van Boxel-DezaireDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Joana A Zula
Yaomin Xu
Richard M Ransohoff
James W Jacobberger
George R Stark
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USLaboratory of Molecular Genetics · PL

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
TELOMERASE INACTIVATION BY RNASE L SIGNALS CELL DEATHP01CA062220 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LI, XIAOXIA, STARK, GEORGE ROBERT · 1994 to 2020
$35.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA06220NCI NIH HHS P01 CA062220NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS P30 CA43703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of cell lines with type I IFNs activates the formation of IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (STAT1/STAT2/IFN regulatory factor-9), which induces the expression of many genes. To study this response in primary cells, we treated fresh human blood with IFN-β and used flow cytometry to analyze phosphorylated STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, B cells, and monocytes. The activation of STAT1 was remarkably different among these leukocyte subsets. In contrast to monocytes and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, few B cells activated STAT1 in response to IFN-β, a finding that could not be explained by decreased levels of IFNAR2 or STAT1 or enhanced levels of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 or relevant protein tyrosine phosphatases in B cells. Microarray and real-time PCR analyses revealed the induction of STAT1-dependent proapoptotic mRNAs in monocytes but not in B cells. These data show that IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 or STAT1 homodimers are not the main activators of gene expression in primary B cells of healthy humans. Notably, in B cells and, especially in CD4(+) T cells, IFN-β activated STAT5 in addition to STAT3, with biological effects often opposite from those driven by activated STAT1. These data help to explain why IFN-β increases the survival of primary human B cells and CD4(+) T cells but enhances the apoptosis of monocytes, as well as to understand how leukocyte subsets are differentially affected by endogenous type I IFNs during viral or bacterial infections and by type I IFN treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis, hepatitis, or cancer.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBlotting, WesternB-LymphocytesCell LineCell SeparationFlow CytometryGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationHumansInterferon-betaInterferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3MonocytesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 Transcription FactorInterferon-betaInterferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3STAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 Transcription FactorSTAT5 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID20956346
PMCPMC3244975
OpenAlexW2163909063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.