Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20955930›Full record

ReviewNeuron2010

Neurocognitive phenotypes and genetic dissection of disorders of brain and behavior.

Eliza Congdon, Russell A Poldrack, Nelson B Freimer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: implications for genetics research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The young and the reckless.Nature neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eliza CongdonCenter for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Russell A Poldrack
Nelson B Freimer

Funding

Vervet Monkey (Cercopithecus Aethiops) Genetic MapR01RR016300 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2002 to 2011
$6.3M
Human Translational Applications Core (HTA - Core) (7 of 8)PL1MH083271 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2007 to 2011
$5.8M
Bipolar Endophenotypes in Population IsolatesR01MH075007 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2007 to 2011
$3.8M
Whole Genome Assoc. Analysis Strategies for Multi. PhenotypesRL1MH083268 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FREIMER, NELSON B. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics-Coordinating Center (1 of 8)UL1DE019580 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BILDER, ROBERT M · 2008 to 2011
$1.9M
The Cognitive Atlas: Developing an Interdisciplinary Knowledge Base Through SociaR01MH082795 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
NCRR NIH HHS R01RR01630NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR016300NIDCR NIH HHS UL1 DE019580NIDCR NIH HHS UL1 DE019580-03NIMH NIH HHS PL1 MH083271NIMH NIH HHS PL1MH083271NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075007NIMH NIH HHS R01MH075007NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082795NIMH NIH HHS R01MH082795NIMH NIH HHS RL1 MH083268NIMH NIH HHS RL1MH083268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying quantitative neurocognitive phenotypes will further our understanding of the brain's structural and functional architecture and advance the diagnosis and treatment of the psychiatric disorders that these traits underlie. Although many neurocognitive traits are highly heritable, little progress has been made in identifying genetic variants unequivocally associated with these phenotypes. A major obstacle to such progress is the difficulty in identifying heritable neurocognitive measures that are precisely defined and systematically assessed and represent unambiguous mental constructs, yet are also amenable to the high-throughput phenotyping necessary to obtain adequate power for genetic association studies. In this perspective we compare the current status of genetic investigations of neurocognitive phenotypes to that of other categories of biomedically relevant traits and suggest strategies for genetically dissecting traits that may underlie disorders of brain and behavior.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePhenotypeAnimalsBehavioral SymptomsBrain DiseasesCognition DisordersGenetic Association StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID20955930
PMCPMC4123421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.