Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20955354›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2010

Outcome of different post-orchiectomy management for stage I seminoma: Japanese multi-institutional study including 425 patients.

Tomomi Kamba, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Kazutoshi Okubo, Satoshi Teramukai, Yoshiyuki Kakehi, Tadashi Matsuda, Osamu Ogawa

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Canadian Urological Association consensus guideline: Management of testicular germ cell cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Testicular seminoma clinical stage 1: treatment outcome on a routine care level.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pure seminoma: a review and update.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomomi KambaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Translational Research Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiyuki Kamoto
Kazutoshi Okubo
Satoshi Teramukai
Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Tadashi Matsuda
Osamu Ogawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo clarify the contemporary clinical outcome of stage I seminoma and to provide information on treatment options to patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 425 patients who underwent orchiectomy for stage I seminoma between 1985 and 2006 at 25 hospitals in Japan. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and clinicopathological factors associated with relapse were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsA total of 30 out of 425 patients had relapsed. Relapse-free survival rates at 10 years were 79, 94 and 94% in the surveillance, chemotherapy and radiotherapy groups, respectively. Post-orchiectomy management and rete testis invasion were identified as independent predictive factors associated with relapse. Rete testis invasion remained to be an independent predictive factor, even if the cases with relapses in the contralateral testis were censored. Only one patient, who relapsed after adjuvant radiotherapy, died of the disease. Overall survival at 10 years was 100, 100 and 99% in the surveillance, chemotherapy and radiotherapy groups, respectively. More than half of the patients were lost to follow up within 5 years.

conclusionsThe outcome of Japanese patients with stage I seminoma is similar to previously published Western reports. Surveillance policy is becoming a popular option in Japan, although the relapse rate in patients opting for surveillance policy is higher than those opting for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Rete testis invasion is an independent predictive factor associated with relapse regardless of the post-orchiectomy management. Long-term follow up is mandatory for detection of late relapse.

Indexed as

OrchiectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPopulation SurveillancePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSeminoma

Identifiers

PMID20955354
PMCPMC3017741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.