Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20953849›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2011

Congenital and perinatal infections: throwing new light with an old TORCH.

Anita Shet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SARS-CoV-2: Is it the newest spark in the TORCH?Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Zika Fetal Neuropathogenesis: Etiology of a Viral Syndrome.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Progesterone and autoimmune disease.Autoimmunity reviews · 2012
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anita ShetDepartment of Pediatrics, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560034, India. anitashet@gmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections acquired in utero or in the immediate post-natal period play a prominent role in perinatal and childhood morbidity. The TORCH constellation continues to be popular among perinatologists and paediatricians, although its limitations are increasingly known. A host of new organisms are now considered to be perpetrators of congenital and perinatal infections, and a diverse range of diagnostic tests are now available for confirming infection in the infant. In general, the collective TORCH serological panel has low diagnostic yield; instead individual tests ordered according to clinical presentation can contribute better towards appropriate diagnosis. This review captures the essence of established congenital infections such as cytomegalovirus, rubella, toxoplasmosis, syphilis and herpes simplex virus, as well as more recent entrants such as HIV and hepatitis B infection, varicella and tuberculosis. Selective screening of the mother and newborn, encouraging good personal hygiene and universal immunization are some measures that can contribute towards decreasing the incidence and morbidity of congenital and perinatal infections.

Indexed as

ToxoplasmosisToxoplasmosis, CongenitalAbbreviations as TopicCytomegalovirus InfectionsHerpes SimplexHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesRubella

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.