Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20953251›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2010

Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?

Joshua P Martin, John G Hildebrand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dissecting the signaling mechanisms underlying recognition and preference of food odors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Insect chemoreception: a tribute to John G. Hildebrand.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Article
  10. Synchronous firing of antennal-lobe projection neurons encodes the behaviorally effective ratio of sex-pheromone components in male Manduca sexta.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua P MartinDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.
John G Hildebrand
University of Arizona · US

Funding

GLOMERULI AS FUNCTIONAL UNITS FOR OLFACTORY CODINGR01DC002751 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HILDEBRAND, JOHN G · 1995 to 2013
$4.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multiple volatiles in characteristic mixtures. Here, we review evidence that both categories of odors are processed as sensory objects, and we suggest a mechanism in the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), that encodes the configuration of these mixtures and may underlie recognition of innately attractive odors. In the pheromone system, mixtures of two or three volatiles elicit upwind flight. Peripheral changes are associated with behavioral changes in speciation, and suggest the existence of a pattern recognition mechanism for pheromone mixtures in the AL. Moths are similarly innately attracted to certain floral scents. Though floral scents consist of multiple volatiles that activate a broad array of receptor neurons, only a smaller subset, numerically comparable to pheromone mixtures, is necessary and sufficient to elicit behavior. Both pheromone and floral scent mixtures that produce attraction to the odor source elicit synchronous action potentials in particular populations of output (projection) neurons (PNs) in the AL. We propose a model in which the synchronous output of a population of PNs encodes the configuration of an innately attractive mixture, and thus comprises an innate mechanism for releasing odor-tracking behavior. The particular example of olfaction in moths may inform the general question of how sensory objects trigger innate responses.

Indexed as

floral scentmothsneuroethologyolfactionpheromonesensory codingsensory objectsynchrony

Identifiers

PMID20953251
PMCPMC2955495
OpenAlexW2022942744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.