Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20952245›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2010

Chemically modified antibodies as diagnostic imaging agents.

Jeffrey J Day, Bernadette V Marquez, Heather E Beck, Tolulope A Aweda, Prasad D Gawande, Claude F Meares

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pretargeting: A Path Forward for Radioimmunotherapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The radiolabeling of proteins by the [18F]AlF method.Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeffrey J DayChemistry Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Bernadette V Marquez
Heather E Beck
Tolulope A Aweda
Prasad D Gawande
Claude F Meares

Funding

BIFUNCTIONAL CHELATING AGENTS IN TUMOR LOCALIZATIONR01CA016861 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MEARES, CLAUDE F. · 1985 to 2009
$2.3M
Bispecific Antibody Engineering for AML RITR01CA136639 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI PRESS, OLIVER W. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
BIFUNCTIONAL CHELATING AGENTS IN TUMOR LOCALIZATIONR37CA016861 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MEARES, CLAUDE F. · 1990 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA016861NCI NIH HHS CA136639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA016861NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notable new applications of antibodies for imaging involve genetically extracting the essential molecular recognition properties of an antibody, and in some cases enhancing them by mutation, before protein expression. The classic paradigm of intravenous administration of a labeled antibody to image not only its target but also its metabolism can be improved on. Protocols involving molecular targeting with an engineered unlabeled protein derived from an antibody, followed by capture of a small probe molecule that provides a signal, are being developed to a high level of utility. This is accompanied by new strategies for probe capture such as irreversible binding, incorporation of engineered enzyme active sites, and antibody-ligand systems that generate a signal only upon binding or uptake.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesDiagnostic ImagingHumansLigandsOrgan SpecificityAntibodiesLigands

Identifiers

PMID20952245
PMCPMC3010408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.