SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2010
A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Pooled it
- Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Pooled it
- Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Pooled it
- Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Pooled it
- Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).Implementation science : IS · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2011Pooled it
- Harnessing institutional knowledge: mixed methods evaluation of peer coaching in a multi-site EHR transition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- On the perspective of doctors' intention-a hybrid BYOD model.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- "For the first time…I am seriously fighting burnout": clinician experiences with a challenging electronic health record transition.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Attitudes and barriers toward video visits in surgical care: Insights from a nationwide survey among surgeons.Surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- The Integrated Electronic Health System in Iranian health centers: benefits and challenges.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- A Systematic Approach in Developing Management Workforce Readiness for Digital Health Transformation in Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Improvement of the Japanese healthcare data system for the effective management of patients with COVID-19: A national survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Determinants predicting the electronic medical record adoption in healthcare: A SEM-Artificial Neural Network approach.PloS one · 2022Article
- A Methodology for Evaluating Operator Usage of Machine Learning Recommendations for Power Grid Contingency Analysis.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
- Super-multifactorial survey YHAB revealed high prevalence of sleep apnoea syndrome in unaware older adults and potential combinatorial factors for its initial screening.Frontiers in aging · 2022Article
- Implementation of Electronic Medical Records in Mental Health Settings: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2021Article
- Temporal rank of clinical characteristics and prognosis of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe health care sector is an area of social and economic interest in several countries; therefore, there have been lots of efforts in the use of electronic health records. Nevertheless, there is evidence suggesting that these systems have not been adopted as it was expected, and although there are some proposals to support their adoption, the proposed support is not by means of information and communication technology which can provide automatic tools of support. The aim of this study is to identify the critical adoption factors for electronic health records by physicians and to use them as a guide to support their adoption process automatically.
methodsThis paper presents, based on the PRISMA statement, a systematic literature review in electronic databases with adoption studies of electronic health records published in English. Software applications that manage and process the data in the electronic health record have been considered, i.e.: computerized physician prescription, electronic medical records, and electronic capture of clinical data. Our review was conducted with the purpose of obtaining a taxonomy of the physicians main barriers for adopting electronic health records, that can be addressed by means of information and communication technology; in particular with the information technology roles of the knowledge management processes. Which take us to the question that we want to address in this work: "What are the critical adoption factors of electronic health records that can be supported by information and communication technology?". Reports from eight databases covering electronic health records adoption studies in the medical domain, in particular those focused on physicians, were analyzed.
resultsThe review identifies two main issues: 1) a knowledge-based classification of critical factors for adopting electronic health records by physicians; and 2) the definition of a base for the design of a conceptual framework for supporting the design of knowledge-based systems, to assist the adoption process of electronic health records in an automatic fashion. From our review, six critical adoption factors have been identified: user attitude towards information systems, workflow impact, interoperability, technical support, communication among users, and expert support. The main limitation of the taxonomy is the different impact of the adoption factors of electronic health records reported by some studies depending on the type of practice, setting, or attention level; however, these features are a determinant aspect with regard to the adoption rate for the latter rather than the presence of a specific critical adoption factor.
conclusionsThe critical adoption factors established here provide a sound theoretical basis for research to understand, support, and facilitate the adoption of electronic health records to physicians in benefit of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.