Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20950327›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2011

Nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery and targeting to the central nervous system.

Emanuela Fabiola Craparo, Maria Luisa Bondì, Giovanna Pitarresi, Gennara Cavallaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advances in the design of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for targeting brain diseases.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Nanoscale drug delivery systems and the blood-brain barrier.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuela Fabiola CraparoDipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologie Farmaceutiche, Università di Palermo, via Archirafi, 32-90123 Palermo, Italy. ema.craparo@unipa.it
Maria Luisa Bondì
Giovanna Pitarresi
Gennara Cavallaro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain delivery is one of the major challenges for the neuropharmaceutical industry since an alarming increase in brain disease incidence is going on. Despite major advances in neuroscience, many potential therapeutic agents are denied access to the central nervous system (CNS) because of the existence of a physiological low permeable barrier, the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To obtain an improvement of drug CNS performance, sophisticated approaches such as nanoparticulate systems are rapidly developing. Many recent data demonstrate that drugs could be transported successfully into the brain using colloidal systems after i.v. injection by several mechanisms such as endocytosis or P-glycoprotein inhibition. This review summarizes the main brain targeted nanoparticulate carriers such as liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and micelles with great potential in drug delivery into the CNS.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsBrainCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesMicellesParticle SizePolymersSurface PropertiesCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug CarriersLiposomesMicellesPolymers

Identifiers

PMID20950327
PMCPMC6493787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.