Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20949221›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2010

Open access microfluidic device for the study of cell migration during chemotaxis.

Dawit Jowhar, Gus Wright, Philip C Samson, John P Wikswo, Christopher Janetopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A microfluidic technique to probe cell deformability.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  9. Review
  10. A microfluidic-enabled mechanical microcompressor for the immobilization of live single- and multi-cellular specimens.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. On-chip open microfluidic devices for chemotaxis studies.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawit JowharDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B #351634, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Gus Wright
Philip C Samson
John P Wikswo
Christopher Janetopoulos
Vanderbilt University · USIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

PI(3,4,5)P3 Regulates Cell Polarity During Chemotaxis and CytokinesisR01GM080370 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JANETOPOULOS, CHRISTOPHER J · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080370PHS HHS NIHGM080370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells sense and interpret chemical gradients, and respond by localized responses that lead to directed migration. An open microfluidic device (OMD) was developed to provide quantitative information on both the gradient and morphological changes that occurred as cells crawled through various microfabricated channels. This device overcame problems that many current devices have been plagued with, such as complicated cell loading, media evaporation and channel blockage by air bubbles. We used a micropipette to set up stable gradients formed by passive diffusion and thus avoided confounding cellular responses produced by shear forces. Two versions of the OMD are reported here: one device that has channels with widths of 6, 8, 10 and 12 μm, while the other has two large 100 μm channels to minimize cellular interaction with lateral walls. These experiments compared the migration rates and qualitative behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum cells responding to measurable cAMP and folic acid gradients in small and large channels. We report on the influence that polarity has on a cell's ability to migrate when confined in a channel. Polarized cells that migrated to cAMP were significantly faster than the unpolarized cells that crawled toward folic acid. Unpolarized cells in wide channels often strayed off course, yet migrated faster than unpolarized cells in confined channels. Cells in channels farthest from the micropipette migrated through the channels at rates similar to cells in channels with higher concentrations, suggesting that cell speed was independent of mean concentration. Lastly, it was found that the polarized cells could easily change migration direction even when only the leading edge of the cell was exposed to a lateral gradient.

Indexed as

Cell MovementCell PolarityCell TrackingChemotaxisCyclic AMPDictyosteliumEquipment DesignFolic AcidMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesCyclic AMPFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20949221
PMCPMC3806978
OpenAlexW2132374476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.