ArticlePloS one2010
Investigation of K14/K5 as a stem cell marker in the limbal region of the bovine cornea.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a heparin-like glycosaminoglycan from snail mucus in a murine model of dry eye.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- "Eye-Conic" Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals the Layer-Specific Molecular Alterations in Corneas of Patients With Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies keratins as key regulators of corneal scarring in a murine model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Dynamic Cellular Processes in Corneal Epithelium During Wound Healing in Cynomolgus Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Article
- Cultivated autologous limbal epithelial cell (CALEC) transplantation: Development of manufacturing process and clinical evaluation of feasibility and safety.Science advances · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Molecular characteristics and spatial distribution of adult human corneal cell subtypes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A single cell atlas of human cornea that defines its development, limbal progenitor cells and their interactions with the immune cells.The ocular surface · 2021Article
- Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the equine corneal epithelium.Veterinary ophthalmology · 2019Article
- An Insight into the Difficulties in the Discovery of Specific Biomarkers of Limbal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into corneal epithelial progenitor cells under defined conditions.PloS one · 2017Article
- Expression and localization of epithelial stem cell and differentiation markers in equine skin, eye and hoof.Veterinary dermatology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentification of stem cells from a corneal epithelial cell population by specific molecular markers has been investigated previously. Expressions of P63, ABCG2 and K14/K5 have all been linked to mammalian corneal epithelial stem cells. Here we report on the limitations of K14/K5 as a limbal stem cell marker. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsK14/K5 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry, Western blotting and Real time PCR and compared between bovine epithelial cells in the limbus and central cornea. A functional study was also included to investigate changes in K5/14 expression within cultured limbal epithelial cells undergoing forced differentiation. K14 expression (or its partner K5) was detected in quiescent epithelial cells from both the limbal area and central cornea. K14 was localized predominantly to basal epithelial cells in the limbus and suprabasal epithelial cells in the central cornea. Western blotting revealed K14 expression in both limbus and central cornea (higher levels in the limbus). Similarly, quantitative real time PCR found K5, partner to K14, to be expressed in both the central cornea and limbus. Following forced differentiation in culture the limbal epithelial cells revealed an increase in K5/14 gene/protein expression levels in concert with a predictable rise in a known differentiation marker. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: K14 and its partner K5 are limited not only to the limbus but also to the central bovine cornea epithelial cells suggesting K14/K5 is not limbal specific in situ. Furthermore K14/K5 expression levels were not lowered (in fact they increased) within a limbal epithelial cell culture undergoing forced differentiation suggesting K14/K5 is an unreliable maker for undifferentiated cells ex vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.