Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20949102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Automatic figure ranking and user interfacing for intelligent figure search.

Hong Yu, Feifan Liu, Balaji Polepalli Ramesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Visual Summary Identification From Scientific PublicationsFrontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021
    Article
  3. Figure and caption extraction from biomedical documents.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automatic figure classification in bioscience literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2011
    Article
  9. The biomedical discourse relation bank.BMC bioinformatics · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong YuDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America. hongyu@uwm.edu
Feifan Liu
Balaji Polepalli Ramesh

Funding

HERMES - Help physicians to Extract and aRticulate Multimedia information from liR01LM009836 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI YU, HONG · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
Towards the Building of a Comprehensive Searchable Biological Experiment DatabaseR21RR024933 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI YU, HONG · 2008 to 2009
$410k
NCRR NIH HHS 5R21RR024933NCRR NIH HHS R21 RR024933NLM NIH HHS 5R01LM009836NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFigures are important experimental results that are typically reported in full-text bioscience articles. Bioscience researchers need to access figures to validate research facts and to formulate or to test novel research hypotheses. On the other hand, the sheer volume of bioscience literature has made it difficult to access figures. Therefore, we are developing an intelligent figure search engine (http://figuresearch.askhermes.org). Existing research in figure search treats each figure equally, but we introduce a novel concept of "figure ranking": figures appearing in a full-text biomedical article can be ranked by their contribution to the knowledge discovery. METHODOLOGY/

findingsWe empirically validated the hypothesis of figure ranking with over 100 bioscience researchers, and then developed unsupervised natural language processing (NLP) approaches to automatically rank figures. Evaluating on a collection of 202 full-text articles in which authors have ranked the figures based on importance, our best system achieved a weighted error rate of 0.2, which is significantly better than several other baseline systems we explored. We further explored a user interfacing application in which we built novel user interfaces (UIs) incorporating figure ranking, allowing bioscience researchers to efficiently access important figures. Our evaluation results show that 92% of the bioscience researchers prefer as the top two choices the user interfaces in which the most important figures are enlarged. With our automatic figure ranking NLP system, bioscience researchers preferred the UIs in which the most important figures were predicted by our NLP system than the UIs in which the most important figures were randomly assigned. In addition, our results show that there was no statistical difference in bioscience researchers' preference in the UIs generated by automatic figure ranking and UIs by human ranking annotation. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The evaluation results conclude that automatic figure ranking and user interfacing as we reported in this study can be fully implemented in online publishing. The novel user interface integrated with the automatic figure ranking system provides a more efficient and robust way to access scientific information in the biomedical domain, which will further enhance our existing figure search engine to better facilitate accessing figures of interest for bioscientists.

Indexed as

AutomationUser-Computer InterfaceModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID20949102
PMCPMC2951344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.