Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20948829›Full record

ArticleF1000 medicine reports2010

Recanalization and reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke.

David S Liebeskind

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000 medicine reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Significant aortic stenosis associated with poorer functional outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Critical Care of Brain Reperfusion.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Albumin therapy enhances collateral perfusion after laser-induced middle cerebral artery branch occlusion: a laser speckle contrast flow study.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2012
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S LiebeskindUniversity of California at Los Angeles Stroke Center 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
University of West Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA SPOTRIAS CENTER APPLICATION RENEWAL-PROGRAM PROJECTP50NS044378 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SAVER, JEFFREY L · 2003 to 2012
$17.2M
Collateral Circulation in Acute Ischemic StrokeK23NS054084 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LIEBESKIND, DAVID SIGMUND · 2006 to 2010
$764k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS054084NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS044378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revascularization remains the most intuitive strategy to reverse ischemic injury associated with arterial occlusion in acute stroke. Revascularization may lead to opening of an occluded artery, or recanalization, yet restoration of downstream flow, or reperfusion, may not ensue. Revascularization strategies and novel devices continue to broaden options for the treatment of acute stroke, but it is increasingly apparent that selection criteria to identify ideal cases are needed to refine triage and minimize adverse events. The results of recent work on reperfusion may rapidly alter routine clinical practice for evolving ischemia in the brain.

Identifiers

PMID20948829
PMCPMC2954422
OpenAlexW2119617146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.