Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20948756›Full record

ArticleF1000 medicine reports2009

Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: implications for current clinical practice.

Venkataraman Subramanian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000 medicine reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkataraman SubramanianNottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospital (QMC campus) Nottingham NG7 2UH UK.
NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection should always be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms, as it is well known to induce or mimic a flare of IBD. There is currently an alarming increase in the incidence of C. difficile infection in Europe and North America. Current epidemiologic data suggest that more virulent strains, such as C. difficile 027/NAP1/BI, are emerging. Testing for both C. difficile toxins A and B should be done, and often serial stool samples may be required, especially if the index of suspicion is high. Patients with IBD do not necessarily require a history of antibiotic use or hospitalization to acquire the infection and most do not have pseudomembranes on sigmoidoscopy. C. difficile infection is associated with longer hospital stays, increased mortality, and higher complication rates, including colectomy. Treatment with oral vancomycin is probably the drug of choice as one study suggests that patients had lower colectomy rates on this drug. Further work is required to clarify the best management strategies for C. difficile in IBD patients, and more effort is needed to halt the rising incidence of this infection, perhaps with adherence to safer antibiotic prescribing guidelines, hand washing, and cleaner hospital environments, which should reduce the risk of acquiring and spreading this preventable infection.

Identifiers

PMID20948756
PMCPMC2920704
OpenAlexW2002073609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.