ArticleF1000 medicine reports2009
Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: implications for current clinical practice.
Article in F1000 medicine reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clostridium difficile infection should always be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms, as it is well known to induce or mimic a flare of IBD. There is currently an alarming increase in the incidence of C. difficile infection in Europe and North America. Current epidemiologic data suggest that more virulent strains, such as C. difficile 027/NAP1/BI, are emerging. Testing for both C. difficile toxins A and B should be done, and often serial stool samples may be required, especially if the index of suspicion is high. Patients with IBD do not necessarily require a history of antibiotic use or hospitalization to acquire the infection and most do not have pseudomembranes on sigmoidoscopy. C. difficile infection is associated with longer hospital stays, increased mortality, and higher complication rates, including colectomy. Treatment with oral vancomycin is probably the drug of choice as one study suggests that patients had lower colectomy rates on this drug. Further work is required to clarify the best management strategies for C. difficile in IBD patients, and more effort is needed to halt the rising incidence of this infection, perhaps with adherence to safer antibiotic prescribing guidelines, hand washing, and cleaner hospital environments, which should reduce the risk of acquiring and spreading this preventable infection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.