Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20948584›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2010

Mechanisms of induction and maintenance of spike-timing dependent plasticity in biophysical synapse models.

Michael Graupner, Nicolas Brunel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity: A Burst in the Field of Learning and Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cognition of Time and Thinking Beyond.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Calcium and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reduced order models of myelinated axonal compartments.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael GraupnerCenter for Neural Science, New York University New York City, NY, USA.
Nicolas Brunel

Funding

Segregation of Auditory Signals in CortexR01DC005787 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI REYES, ALEX D · 2003 to 2013
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review biophysical models of synaptic plasticity, with a focus on spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP). The common property of the discussed models is that synaptic changes depend on the dynamics of the intracellular calcium concentration, which itself depends on pre- and postsynaptic activity. We start by discussing simple models in which plasticity changes are based directly on calcium amplitude and dynamics. We then consider models in which dynamic intracellular signaling cascades form the link between the calcium dynamics and the plasticity changes. Both mechanisms of induction of STDP (through the ability of pre/postsynaptic spikes to evoke changes in the state of the synapse) and of maintenance of the evoked changes (through bistability) are discussed.

Indexed as

biophysical modelsbistabilitycalcium control hypothesisCaMKIIinductionmaintenanceprotein signaling cascadeSTDP

Identifiers

PMID20948584
PMCPMC2953414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.