Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20948291›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Antibody immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplant: Part II.

Dusko Klipa, Nadim Mahmud, Nasimul Ahsan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Necroptosis in the Pathophysiology of Disease.The American journal of pathology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. ATS Core Curriculum 2014: part I. Adult pulmonary medicine.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dusko KlipaMayo Clinic Florida, USA.
Nadim Mahmud
Nasimul Ahsan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antibodies in transplantation dates to 1986 when muromonab CD3, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD3, was first approved for prevention and treatment of renal allograft rejection. These agents have largely been used in a brief adjunctive manner to provide immunosuppression during the initial period after solid organ transplantation or during an episode of acute rejection. Recent advances in our understanding of transplant immunology have allowed emergence of numerous new mAbs, targeting co-stimulatory signals, cell surface receptors and novel protein constructs. During the next decade, transplant professionals will increasingly require knowledge of the mechanisms and pharmacologic characteristics of these novel therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalClinical Trials as TopicGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20948291
PMCPMC3011215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.