Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20947487›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2010

A comprehensive survey of clonal diversity measures in Barrett's esophagus as biomarkers of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Lauren M F Merlo, Najaf A Shah, Xiaohong Li, Patricia L Blount, Thomas L Vaughan, Brian J Reid, Carlo C Maley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren M F MerloMolecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, The Wistar Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19104, USA.
Najaf A Shah
Xiaohong Li
Patricia L Blount
Thomas L Vaughan
Brian J Reid
Carlo C Maley
The Wistar Institute · USCancer Research Center · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
PHYLOGENIES of Barrett's Esophagus LineagesP01CA091955 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GRADY, WILLIAM MALLORY · 2002 to 2019
$35.9M
Modeling Neoplastic Progression in Barrett's Esophagus - Renewal -2R01CA140657 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Carlo Maley · 2009 to 2026
$5.0M
Modeling Colon Cancer, Intervention and PreventionR01CA107028 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LUEBECK, GEORG E. · 2005 to 2013
$2.1M
MSM Scales of carcinogenesis: cells, crypts and cancerR01CA119224 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LUEBECK, GEORG E · 2005 to 2007
$799k
An Intra-Neoplasm Genetic Diversity AssayR03CA137811 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MALEY, CARLO · 2008 to 2009
$163k
The role of selection and genetic diversity in cancer progressionF32CA132450 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MERLO, LAUREN · 2008 to 2009
$101k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA132450NCI NIH HHS P01 CA091955NCI NIH HHS P01 CA91955NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107028NCI NIH HHS R01 CA119224NCI NIH HHS R01 CA14065NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140657NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoplastic progression is an evolutionary process driven by the generation of clonal diversity and natural selection on that diversity within a neoplasm. We hypothesized that clonal diversity is associated with risk of progression to cancer. We obtained molecular data from a cohort of 239 participants with Barrett's esophagus, including microsatellite shifts and loss of heterozygosity, DNA content tetraploidy and aneuploidy, methylation, and sequence mutations. Using these data, we tested all major diversity measurement methods, including genetic divergence and entropy-based measures, to determine which measures are correlated with risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. We also tested whether the use of different sets of loci and alterations to define clones (e.g., selectively advantageous versus evolutionarily neutral) improved the predictive value of the diversity indices. All diversity measures were strong and highly significant predictors of progression (Cox proportional hazards model, P < 0.001). The type of alterations evaluated had little effect on the predictive value of most of the diversity measures. In summary, diversity measures are robust predictors of progression to cancer in this cohort.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusBiomarkers, TumorCell SeparationClone CellsDisease ProgressionDNA MethylationEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFlow CytometryGenotypeHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMaleBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20947487
PMCPMC3004782
OpenAlexW2112794045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.