Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20946653›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Systematic identification of conserved motif modules in the human genome.

Xiaohui Cai, Lin Hou, Naifang Su, Haiyan Hu, Minghua Deng, Xiaoman Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PreDREM: a database of predicted DNA regulatory motifs from 349 human cell and tissue samples.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohui CaiCenter for Research in Biological Systems, University of California, SanDiego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Lin Hou
Naifang Su
Haiyan Hu
Minghua Deng
Xiaoman Li
Peking University · CNUniversity of Central Florida · USBeijing Proteome Research Center · CNUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Discovery of Cis-regulatory Modules in Human GenomeR01HG004359 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI LI, XIAOMAN · 2007 to 2009
$864k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG004359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of motif modules, groups of multiple motifs frequently occurring in DNA sequences, is one of the most important tasks necessary for annotating the human genome. Current approaches to identifying motif modules are often restricted to searches within promoter regions or rely on multiple genome alignments. However, the promoter regions only account for a limited number of locations where transcription factor binding sites can occur, and multiple genome alignments often cannot align binding sites with their true counterparts because of the short and degenerative nature of these transcription factor binding sites.

resultsTo identify motif modules systematically, we developed a computational method for the entire non-coding regions around human genes that does not rely upon the use of multiple genome alignments. First, we selected orthologous DNA blocks approximately 1-kilobase in length based on discontiguous sequence similarity. Next, we scanned the conserved segments in these blocks using known motifs in the TRANSFAC database. Finally, a frequent pattern mining technique was applied to identify motif modules within these blocks. In total, with a false discovery rate cutoff of 0.05, we predicted 3,161,839 motif modules, 90.8% of which are supported by various forms of functional evidence. Compared with experimental data from 14 ChIP-seq experiments, on average, our methods predicted 69.6% of the ChIP-seq peaks with TFBSs of multiple TFs. Our findings also show that many motif modules have distance preference and order preference among the motifs, which further supports the functionality of these predictions.

conclusionsOur work provides a large-scale prediction of motif modules in mammals, which will facilitate the understanding of gene regulation in a systematic way.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationConserved SequenceGenome, HumanHumansRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20946653
PMCPMC3091716
OpenAlexW2020217377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.