Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20946619›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Identification of diagnostic subnetwork markers for cancer in human protein-protein interaction network.

Junjie Su, Byung-Jun Yoon, Edward R Dougherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Detecting subnetwork-level dynamic correlations.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence for embryonic stem-like signature and epithelial-mesenchymal transition features in the spheroid cells derived from lung adenocarcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimal cancer prognosis under network uncertainty.EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junjie SuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3128, USA.
Byung-Jun Yoon
Edward R Dougherty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinding reliable gene markers for accurate disease classification is very challenging due to a number of reasons, including the small sample size of typical clinical data, high noise in gene expression measurements, and the heterogeneity across patients. In fact, gene markers identified in independent studies often do not coincide with each other, suggesting that many of the predicted markers may have no biological significance and may be simply artifacts of the analyzed dataset. To find more reliable and reproducible diagnostic markers, several studies proposed to analyze the gene expression data at the level of groups of functionally related genes, such as pathways. Studies have shown that pathway markers tend to be more robust and yield more accurate classification results. One practical problem of the pathway-based approach is the limited coverage of genes by currently known pathways. As a result, potentially important genes that play critical roles in cancer development may be excluded. To overcome this problem, we propose a novel method for identifying reliable subnetwork markers in a human protein-protein interaction (PPI) network.

resultsIn this method, we overlay the gene expression data with the PPI network and look for the most discriminative linear paths that consist of discriminative genes that are highly correlated to each other. The overlapping linear paths are then optimally combined into subnetworks that can potentially serve as effective diagnostic markers. We tested our method on two independent large-scale breast cancer datasets and compared the effectiveness and reproducibility of the identified subnetwork markers with gene-based and pathway-based markers. We also compared the proposed method with an existing subnetwork-based method.

conclusionsThe proposed method can efficiently find reliable subnetwork markers that outperform the gene-based and pathway-based markers in terms of discriminative power, reproducibility and classification performance. Subnetwork markers found by our method are highly enriched in common GO terms, and they can more accurately classify breast cancer metastasis compared to markers found by a previous method.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsProtein Interaction MappingBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20946619
PMCPMC3026382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.