Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20946269›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2010

A comparison of intermediate and long-acting insulins in people with type 2 diabetes starting insulin: an observational database study.

J Gordon, R D Pockett, A P Tetlow, P McEwan, P D Home

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Probability of Achieving Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Practice in the USA.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Unmet Clinical Need in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Conventional Therapy in the UK.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2014
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J GordonSchool of Population Health and Clinical Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. jason.gordon@adelaide.edu.au
R D Pockett
A P Tetlow
P McEwan
P D Home
Cardiff University · GBFlinders University · AUNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInsulin is normally added to oral glucose-lowering drugs in people with type 2 diabetes when glycaemic control becomes suboptimal. We evaluated outcomes in people starting insulin therapy with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), detemir, glargine or premixed insulins.

methodsInsulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes (n = 8009), ≥ 35 years old, HbA(1c) ≥ 6.5% and begun on NPH (n = 1463), detemir (n = 357), glargine (n = 2197) or premix (n = 3992), were identified from a UK database of primary care records (The Health Improvement Network). Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted analyses were conducted, with persistence of insulin therapy assessed by survival analysis.

resultsIn the study population (n = 4337), baseline HbA(1c) was 9.5 ± 1.6%, falling to 8.4 ± 1.5% over 12 months (change -1.1 ± 1.8%, p < 0.001). Compared with NPH, people taking detemir, glargine and premix had an adjusted reduction in HbA(1c) from baseline, of 0.00% (p = 0.99), 0.19% (p < 0.001) and 0.03% (p = 0.51). Body weight increased by 2.8 kg overall (p < 0.001), and by 2.3, 1.7, 1.9, and 3.3 kg on NPH, detemir, glargine and premix (p < 0.001 for all groups); insulin dose at 12 months was 0.70 (overall), 0.64, 0.61, 0.56 and 0.76 U/kg/day. After 36 months, 57% of people on NPH, 67% on glargine and 83% on premix remained on their initially prescribed insulin. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionIn routine clinical practice, people with type 2 diabetes commenced on NPH experienced a modest disadvantage in glycaemic control after 12 months compared with other insulins. When comparing the insulins, glargine achieved best HbA(1c) reduction, while premix showed greatest weight gain and the highest dose requirement, but had the best persistence of therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingInsulinsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin DetemirInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingInsulins

Identifiers

PMID20946269
PMCPMC3036815
OpenAlexW1908020091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.