ArticleKDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining2008
FastANOVA: an Efficient Algorithm for Genome-Wide Association Study.
Article in KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrafast genome-wide scan for SNP-SNP interactions in common complex disease.Genome research · 2012Pooled it
- Evaluation of epistasis detection methods for quantitative phenotypes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Epi-GTBN: an approach of epistasis mining based on genetic Tabu algorithm and Bayesian network.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- The search for gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: challenges in abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- The early transcriptome response of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) to mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti) feeding.PloS one · 2018Article
- An Efficient Nonlinear Regression Approach for Genome-wide Detection of Marginal and Interacting Genetic Variations.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2016Article
- A cautionary note on the impact of protocol changes for genome-wide association SNP × SNP interaction studies: an example on ankylosing spondylitis.Human genetics · 2015Article
- SubPatCNV: approximate subspace pattern mining for mapping copy-number variations.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- GWIS--model-free, fast and exhaustive search for epistatic interactions in case-control GWAS.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- eQTL Epistasis - Challenges and Computational Approaches.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- JointMMCC: joint maximum-margin classification and clustering of imaging data.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2012Article
- Chapter 10: Mining genome-wide genetic markers.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Performance analysis of novel methods for detecting epistasis.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Epistasis detection on quantitative phenotypes by exhaustive enumeration using GPUs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- Tools for efficient epistasis detection in genome-wide association study.Source code for biology and medicine · 2011Article
- TEAM: efficient two-locus epistasis tests in human genome-wide association study.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- FastChi: an efficient algorithm for analyzing gene-gene interactions.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studying the association between quantitative phenotype (such as height or weight) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is an important problem in biology. To understand underlying mechanisms of complex phenotypes, it is often necessary to consider joint genetic effects across multiple SNPs. ANOVA (analysis of variance) test is routinely used in association study. Important findings from studying gene-gene (SNP-pair) interactions are appearing in the literature. However, the number of SNPs can be up to millions. Evaluating joint effects of SNPs is a challenging task even for SNP-pairs. Moreover, with large number of SNPs correlated, permutation procedure is preferred over simple Bonferroni correction for properly controlling family-wise error rate and retaining mapping power, which dramatically increases the computational cost of association study.In this paper, we study the problem of finding SNP-pairs that have significant associations with a given quantitative phenotype. We propose an efficient algorithm, FastANOVA, for performing ANOVA tests on SNP-pairs in a batch mode, which also supports large permutation test. We derive an upper bound of SNP-pair ANOVA test, which can be expressed as the sum of two terms. The first term is based on single-SNP ANOVA test. The second term is based on the SNPs and independent of any phenotype permutation. Furthermore, SNP-pairs can be organized into groups, each of which shares a common upper bound. This allows for maximum reuse of intermediate computation, efficient upper bound estimation, and effective SNP-pair pruning. Consequently, FastANOVA only needs to perform the ANOVA test on a small number of candidate SNP-pairs without the risk of missing any significant ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FastANOVA is orders of magnitude faster than the brute-force implementation of ANOVA tests on all SNP pairs.
Identifiers
20945829PMC2951741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.