Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20945161›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2010

Scientific imperatives, clinical implications, and theoretical underpinnings for the investigation of the relationship between genetic variables and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.

Mirjam A G Sprangers, Jeff A Sloan, Andrea Barsevick, Cynthia Chauhan, Amylou C Dueck, Hein Raat, Quiling Shi, Cornelis J F Van Noorden, GENEQOL Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Remote blood collection among cancer patients and age- and sex-matched controls for biomarker and genetic analyses using the PROFILES registry.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic polymorphisms and haplotypes of BRCA1 gene associated with quality of life and survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The combined polymorphisms of interleukin-6-174GG genotype and interleukin-10 ATA haplotype are associated with a poor quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics associated with various domains of quality of life in oncology patients and their family caregivers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in growth factor genes and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and the general population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirjam A G SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology/J3-211, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.sprangers@amc.uva.nl
Jeff A Sloan
Andrea Barsevick
Cynthia Chauhan
Amylou C Dueck
Hein Raat
Quiling Shi
Cornelis J F Van Noorden
GENEQOL Consortium
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLMayo Clinic · USPrevent Cancer Foundation · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is emerging evidence for a genetic basis of patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes that can ultimately be incorporated into clinical research and practice. Objectives are (1) to provide arguments for the timeliness of investigating the genetic basis of QOL given the scientific advances in genetics and patient-reported QOL research; (2) to describe the clinical implications of such investigations; (3) to present a theoretical foundation for investigating the genetic underpinnings of QOL; and (4) to describe a series of papers resulting from the GENEQOL Consortium that was established to move this work forward.

methodsDiscussion of scientific advances based on relevant literature.

resultsIn genetics, technological advances allow for increases in speed and efficiency and decreases in costs in exploring the genetic underpinnings of disease processes, drug metabolism, treatment response, and survival. In patient-based research, advances yield empirically based and stringent approaches to measurement that are scientifically robust. Insights into the genetic basis of QOL will ultimately allow early identification of patients susceptible to QOL deficits and to target care. The Wilson and Cleary model for patient-reported outcomes was refined by incorporating the genetic underpinnings of QOL.

conclusionsThis series of papers provides a path for QOL and genetics researchers to work together to move this field forward and to unravel the intricate interplay of the genetic underpinnings of patient-reported QOL outcomes. The ultimate result will be a greater understanding of the process relating disease, patient, and doctor that will have the potential to lead to improved survival, QOL, and health services delivery.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth StatusQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID20945161
PMCPMC2977054
OpenAlexW2114761969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.