Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20944017›Full record

ArticleGenetics2011

Contributions of flowering time genes to sunflower domestication and improvement.

Benjamin K Blackman, David A Rasmussen, Jared L Strasburg, Andrew R Raduski, John M Burke, Steven J Knapp, Scott D Michaels, Loren H Rieseberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing Functional Conservation AmongstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-Wide Identification of Flowering-Time Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin K BlackmanDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. bkb7@duke.edu
David A Rasmussen
Jared L Strasburg
Andrew R Raduski
John M Burke
Steven J Knapp
Scott D Michaels
Loren H Rieseberg
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Molecular analysis of the autonomous pathwayR01GM075060 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAELS, SCOTT · 2007 to 2016
$2.8M
TRANSGRESSIVE SEGREGATION, ADAPTATION, AND SPECIATIONR01GM059065 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI RIESEBERG, LOREN H · 2000 to 2008
$1.9M
Demographics and phylogeography of hybrid speciationF32GM072409 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI STRASBURG, JARED L · 2005 to 2007
$118k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM072409-02NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM072409NIGMS NIH HHS GM059065NIGMS NIH HHS GM075060NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059065NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the identity and distribution of molecular changes leading to the evolution of modern crop species provides major insights into the timing and nature of historical forces involved in rapid phenotypic evolution. In this study, we employed an integrated candidate gene strategy to identify loci involved in the evolution of flowering time during early domestication and modern improvement of the sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Sunflower homologs of many genes with known functions in flowering time were isolated and cataloged. Then, colocalization with previously mapped quantitative trait loci (QTLs), expression, or protein sequence differences between wild and domesticated sunflower, and molecular evolutionary signatures of selective sweeps were applied as step-wise criteria for narrowing down an original pool of 30 candidates. This process led to the discovery that five paralogs in the flowering locus T/terminal flower 1 gene family experienced selective sweeps during the evolution of cultivated sunflower and may be the causal loci underlying flowering time QTLs. Our findings suggest that gene duplication fosters evolutionary innovation and that natural variation in both coding and regulatory sequences of these paralogs responded to a complex history of artificial selection on flowering time during the evolution of cultivated sunflower.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, PlantHelianthusMolecular Sequence DataQuantitative Trait LociSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20944017
PMCPMC3018319
OpenAlexW2100915027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.