Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20943877›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2010

Safety and immunogenicity of a novel Staphylococcus aureus vaccine: results from the first study of the vaccine dose range in humans.

Clayton Harro, Robert Betts, Walter Orenstein, Eun-Jeong Kwak, Howard E Greenberg, Matthew T Onorato, Jon Hartzel, Joy Lipka, Mark J DiNubile, Nicholas Kartsonis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00303069 (A Sequential-Panel, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of Merck 0657nI Staphylococcus Aureus Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00303069 phase1completednot on this map

A Sequential-Panel, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of Merck 0657nI Staphylococcus Aureus Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2005 to 2006Enrolled124ConditionsStaphylococcal InfectionsArmsV710, Comparator: Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. A promisingClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccines for the 21st century.EMBO molecular medicine · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clayton HarroCenter for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Hampton House, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. charro@jhsph.edu
Robert Betts
Walter Orenstein
Eun-Jeong Kwak
Howard E Greenberg
Matthew T Onorato
Jon Hartzel
Joy Lipka
Mark J DiNubile
Nicholas Kartsonis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Merck V710 is a novel vaccine containing the conserved Staphylococcus aureus iron surface determinant B shown to be protective in animal models. A phase I, multicenter, double-blind study of the dose range was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted liquid formulation of V710. A total of 124 adults (18 to 55 years of age) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive one 0.5-ml intramuscular injection of V710 (5 μg, 30 μg, or 90 μg) or saline placebo. A positive immune response was defined as at least a 2-fold increase in IsdB-specific IgG levels from baseline levels. Local and systemic adverse events were assessed for 5 and 14 days, respectively, following vaccination. Positive immune responses were detected in 12 (67%) of the 18 subjects in the groups receiving 30 and 90 μg V710 tested at day 10. At day 14, a significantly greater proportion of subjects manifested a positive immune response with higher geometric mean concentrations in the V710 30-μg (86%; geometric mean concentration of 116 μg/ml) and 90-μg (87%; geometric mean concentration of 131 μg/ml) dose groups than in the V710 5-μg (29%; geometric mean concentration of 51 μg/ml) or placebo (4%; geometric mean concentration of 23 μg/ml) groups. Immune responses were durable through day 84. Subjects <40 and ≥40 years of age had comparable immune responses. The most common adverse events were injection-site pain, nausea, fatigue, and headache, usually of mild intensity. No immediate reactions or serious adverse events were reported. In this first study of V710 in humans, a single 30-μg or 90-μg dose was more immunogenic than the 5-μg dose or placebo. Immune responses were evident by 10 to 14 days after vaccination in most responders.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialCation Transport ProteinsDouble-Blind MethodFatigueFemaleHeadacheHumansImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntramuscularMaleMiddle AgedNauseaPainAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, BacterialCation Transport ProteinsImmunoglobulin GIsdB protein, Staphylococcus aureusPlacebosStaphylococcal VaccinesV710 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID20943877
PMCPMC3008200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.