Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20943681›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2011

Prediction of human protein-protein interaction by a mixed Bayesian model and its application to exploring underlying cancer-related pathway crosstalk.

Yan Xu, Wen Hu, Zhiqiang Chang, Huizi Duanmu, Shanzhen Zhang, Zhenqi Li, Zihui Li, Lili Yu, Xia Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yan XuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, People's Republic of China. xuyanls@yahoo.com.cn
Wen Hu
Zhiqiang Chang
Huizi Duanmu
Shanzhen Zhang
Zhenqi Li
Zihui Li
Lili Yu
Xia Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction method has provided an opportunity for elucidating potential biological processes and disease mechanisms. We integrated eight features involving proteomic, genomic, phenotype and functional annotation datasets by a mixed model consisting of full connected Bayesian (FCB) model and naive Bayesian model to predict human PPIs, resulting in 40 447 PPIs which contain 2740 common PPIs with the human protein reference database (HPRD) by a likelihood ratio cutoff of 512. Then we applied them to exploring underlying pathway crosstalk where pathways were derived from the pathway interaction database. Two pathway crosstalk networks (PCNs) were constructed based on PPI sets. The PPI sets were derived from two different sources. One source was strictly the HPRD database while the other source was a combination of HPRD and PPIs predicted by our mixed Bayesian method. We demonstrated that PCNs based on the mixed PPI set showed much more underlying pathway interactions than the HPRD PPI set. Furthermore, we mapped cancer-causing mutated somatic genes to PPIs between significant pathway crosstalk pairs. We extracted highly connected clusters from over-represented subnetworks of PCNs, which were enriched for mutated gene interactions that acted as crosstalk links. Most of the pathways in top ranking clusters were shown to play important roles in cancer. The clusters themselves showed coherent function categories pertaining to cancer development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalProtein Interaction MappingBayes TheoremGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID20943681
PMCPMC3061120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.