ArticlePopulation health metrics2010
Psychosocial stress and strategies for managing adversity: measuring population resilience in New South Wales, Australia.
Article in Population health metrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Mental Health Outcomes of Drought: A Systematic Review and Causal Process Diagram.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Pooled it
- Combined exercise circuit session acutely attenuates stress-induced blood pressure reactivity in healthy adults.Brazilian journal of physical therapyTrial
- Anxiety level among students of different college and universities in India during lock down in connection to the COVID-19 pandemic.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2023Article
- Perceived stress in different countries at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2022Article
- A scoping research literature review to explore bereavement humor.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Mental Health Status, Anxiety, and Depression Levels of Bangladeshi University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2022Article
- Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Students, Assistants, and Faculty of a Dental Institute of Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on perceived stress: The role of defence mechanisms and coping strategies.Journal of contingencies and crisis management · 2021Article
- Second, third, fourth COVID-19 waves and the 'pancession': We need studies that account for the complexities of how the pandemic is affecting alcohol consumption in Australia.Drug and alcohol review · 2021Article
- Anxiety and Social Support as Predictors of Student Academic Motivation During the COVID-19.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Identifying Rewards Over Difficulties Buffers the Impact of Time in COVID-19 Lockdown for Parents in Australia.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- The stress-related hormone norepinephrine induced upregulation of Nix, contributing to ECM protein expression.Cell stress & chaperones · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulations around the world are facing an increasing number of adversities such as the global financial crisis, terrorism, conflict, and climate change. The aim of this paper was to investigate self-reported strategies and sources of support used to get through "tough times" in an Australian context and to identify patterns of response in the general population and differences in potentially vulnerable subgroups.
methodsData were collected through a cross-sectional survey of the New South Wales population in Australia. The final sample consisted of 3,995 New South Wales residents aged 16 years and above who responded to the question: "What are the things that get you through tough times?"
resultsRespondents provided brief comments that were coded into 14 main subject-area categories. The most frequently reported responses were family and self (52%); friends and neighbors (21%); use of positive emotional and philosophical strategies (17%), such as sense of humor, determination, and the belief that things would get better; and religious beliefs (11%). The responses of four population subgroups were compared, based on gender, household income, level of psychological distress, and whether a language other than English was spoken at home. Women reported greater use of friends and neighbors and religious or spiritual beliefs for support, whereas men reported greater use of drinking/smoking and financial supports. Those with lower incomes reported greater reliance on positive emotional and philosophical strategies and on religious or spiritual beliefs. Those with high levels of psychological distress reported greater use of leisure interests and hobbies, drinking/smoking, and less use of positive lifestyle strategies, such as adequate sleep, relaxation, or work/life balance. Those who spoke a language other than English at home were less likely to report relying on self or others (family/friends) or positive emotional and philosophical strategies to get through tough times.
conclusionsUnderstanding strategies and sources of support used by the population to get through adversity is the first step toward identifying the best approaches to build and support strengths and reduce vulnerabilities. It is also possible to reflect on how large-scale threats such as pandemics, disasters, conflict, bereavement, and loss could impact individual and population resilience.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.