Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20942953›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2010

Evolutionary history of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene family in eukaryotes.

Matteo Citarelli, Sachin Teotia, Rebecca S Lamb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Yeast as a Platform to Dissect Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Function fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. PARP1 Suppression Drives ROS Resistance in Aneuploid Cancer Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Poly ADP-Ribosylation in a Plant Pathogenic OomyceteJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Novel anti-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Identification of the Major Effector StSROs in Potato: A PotentialInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo CitarelliPlant Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, Ohio State University, 500 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 W, 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Sachin Teotia
Rebecca S Lamb
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) superfamily was originally identified as enzymes that catalyze the attachment of ADP-ribose subunits to target proteins using NAD+ as a substrate. The family is characterized by the catalytic site, termed the PARP signature. While these proteins can be found in a range of eukaryotes, they have been best studied in mammals. In these organisms, PARPs have key functions in DNA repair, genome integrity and epigenetic regulation. More recently it has been found that proteins within the PARP superfamily have altered catalytic sites, and have mono(ADP-ribose) transferase (mART) activity or are enzymatically inactive. These findings suggest that the PARP signature has a broader range of functions that initially predicted. In this study, we investigate the evolutionary history of PARP genes across the eukaryotes.

resultsWe identified in silico 236 PARP proteins from 77 species across five of the six eukaryotic supergroups. We performed extensive phylogenetic analyses of the identified PARPs. They are found in all eukaryotic supergroups for which sequence is available, but some individual lineages within supergroups have independently lost these genes. The PARP superfamily can be subdivided into six clades. Two of these clades were likely found in the last common eukaryotic ancestor. In addition, we have identified PARPs in organisms in which they have not previously been described.

conclusionsThree main conclusions can be drawn from our study. First, the broad distribution and pattern of representation of PARP genes indicates that the ancestor of all extant eukaryotes encoded proteins of this type. Second, the ancestral PARP proteins had different functions and activities. One of these proteins was similar to human PARP1 and likely functioned in DNA damage response. The second of the ancestral PARPs had already evolved differences in its catalytic domain that suggest that these proteins may not have possessed poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation activity. Third, the diversity of the PARP superfamily is larger than previously documented, suggesting as more eukaryotic genomes become available, this gene family will grow in both number and type.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsEukaryotaHumansPhylogenyPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesProtein Structure, TertiaryPARP1 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID20942953
PMCPMC2964712
OpenAlexW2099283261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.