ArticleProteins2011
Computational studies of colicin insertion into membranes: the closed state.
Article in Proteins, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanism of negative membrane curvature generation by I-BAR domains.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2021Article
- Implicit membrane treatment of buried charged groups: application to peptide translocation across lipid bilayers.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Colicins are water-soluble toxins that, upon interaction with membranes, undergo a conformational change, insert, and form pores in them. Pore formation activity is localized in a bundle of 10 α-helices named the pore-forming domain (PFD). There is evidence that colicins attach to the membrane via a hydrophobic hairpin embedded in the core of the PFD. Two main models have been suggested for the membrane-bound state: penknife and umbrella, differing in regard to the orientation of the hydrophobic hairpin with respect to the membrane. The arrangement of the amphipathic helices has been described as either a compact three-dimensional structure or a two-dimensional array of loosely interacting helices on the membrane surface. Using molecular dynamics simulations with an implicit membrane model, we studied the structure and stability of the conformations proposed earlier for four colicins. We find that colicins are initially driven towards the membrane by electrostatic interactions between basic residues and the negatively charged membrane surface. They do not have a unique binding orientation, but in the predominant orientations the central hydrophobic hairpin is parallel to the membrane. In the inserted state, the estimated free energy tends to be lower for the compact arrangements of the amphipathic helix, but the more expanded ones are in better agreement with experimental distance distributions. The difference in energy between penknife and umbrella conformations is small enough for equilibrium to exist between them. Elongation of the hydrophobic hairpin helices and membrane thinning were found unable to produce stabilization of the transmembrane configuration of the hydrophobic hairpin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.