Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20940453›Full record

ArticleThe journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society2011

Comparison of fixation methods for preservation of morphology, RNAs, and proteins from paraffin-embedded human cancer cell-implanted mouse models.

Yoko Matsuda, Takenori Fujii, Taeko Suzuki, Kazuya Yamahatsu, Kiyoko Kawahara, Kiyoshi Teduka, Yoko Kawamoto, Tetsushi Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Ishiwata, Zenya Naito

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. From fix to fit into the autoptic human brains.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoko MatsudaDepartment of Pathology, Integrative Oncological Pathology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Takenori Fujii
Taeko Suzuki
Kazuya Yamahatsu
Kiyoko Kawahara
Kiyoshi Teduka
Yoko Kawamoto
Tetsushi Yamamoto
Toshiyuki Ishiwata
Zenya Naito
Nippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenograft transplantation of human tumor cells into immunodeficient mice is an important method to clarify the roles of specific molecules or chemicals in vivo. Recently, this method has been reported as a definitive examination to identify tumor stem cells. In this study, the authors compared the morphology and the quality and quantity of ribonucleic acid (RNA) and protein in paraffin-embedded tissues of nude mice implanted with human uterine cervical cancer cells, followed by fixation with commonly used fixatives, including 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF), 20% NBF, and 99% ethanol (EtOH). The quality of the isolated RNA from PFA- and NBF-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues was high, while EtOH-fixed tissues showed degradation of RNA. NBF-fixed tissues showed excellent quality of morphology, but EtOH-fixed tissues showed contraction of cells. Immunohistochemical results showed differences depending on fixations. The 99% EtOH-fixed samples showed decreases of Ki-67 and VEGF-A immunoreactivities, but improved cytokeratin immunoreactivity. This study indicated that formalin fixation is better than alcohol fixation for RNA preservation in paraffin-embedded cancer cell implantation models. Immunohistochemical results differed markedly depending on fixation materials and antibodies; therefore, suitable fixations are needed to quantify and compare the results of immunohistochemical staining on cancer cell implanted nude mice tissues.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsAntigensCell Line, TumorFixativesHumansMaleMiceParaffin EmbeddingProteinsRNATissue FixationAntigensFixativesProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID20940453
PMCPMC3201123
OpenAlexW1991424734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.