ArticleJAMA2010
Cancer screening among patients with advanced cancer.
Article in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline
- Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.The Milbank quarterly · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Low-Value Care Among Older Adults in a Large Statewide Health System.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Screening for Breast Cancer: A Comparative Review of Guidelines.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Disparities with influenza vaccine use in long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Cumulative burden of 144 conditions, critical care hospitalisation and premature mortality across 26 adult cancers.Nature communications · 2023Article
- ASO Author Reflections: It is Time to Deescalate Screening Mammography for Patients Who Do Not Benefit.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Stage IV Non-breast Cancer Patients and Screening Mammography: It is Time to Stop.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Prevalence And Impact of Medical Comorbidities in A Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Population.Clinical lung cancer · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a 5-year mortality prediction model using regularized regression and Medicare data.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2019Article
- Downstream Breast Imaging Following Screening Mammography in Medicare Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Population-Based Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- Breast Cancer Screening in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Lung and Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Utilization.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2017Article
- Breast cancer screening in patients with cancers other than breast.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017Article
- The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.Nature reviews. Urology · 2017Review
- Skin Cancer in U.S. Elderly Adults: Does Life Expectancy Play a Role in Treatment Decisions?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016Article
- Emergency Care Use and the Medicare Hospice Benefit for Individuals with Cancer with a Poor Prognosis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2016Article
- Incorporating prognosis in the care of older adults with multimorbidity: description and evaluation of a novel curriculum.BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Clinical Consultation Guide: How to Optimize the Use of Prostate-specific Antigen in the Current Era.European urology focus · 2015Article
- Statin use in cancer patients with brain metastases: a missed communication opportunity at the end of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextCancer screening has been integrated into routine primary care but does not benefit patients with limited life expectancy.
objectiveTo evaluate the extent to which patients with advanced cancer continue to be screened for new cancers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsUtilization of cancer screening procedures (mammography, Papanicolaou test, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], and lower gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy) was assessed in 87,736 fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 65 years or older diagnosed with advanced lung, colorectal, pancreatic, gastroesophageal, or breast cancer between 1998 and 2005, and reported to one of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registries. Participants were followed up until death or December 31, 2007, whichever came first. A group of 87,307 Medicare enrollees without cancer were individually matched by age, sex, race, and SEER registry to patients with cancer and observed over the same period to evaluate screening rates in context. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with screening were also investigated.
main outcome measureFor each cancer screening test, utilization rates were defined as the percentage of patients who were screened following the diagnosis of an incurable cancer.
resultsAmong women following advanced cancer diagnosis compared with controls, at least 1 screening mammogram was received by 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6%-9.1%) vs 22.0% (95% CI, 21.7%-22.5%); Papanicolaou test screening was received by 5.8% (95% CI, 5.6%-6.1%) vs 12.5% (95% CI, 12.2%-12.8%). Among men following advanced cancer diagnosis compared with controls, PSA test was received by 15.0% (95% CI, 14.7%-15.3%) vs 27.2% (95% CI, 26.8%-27.6%). For all patients following advanced diagnosis compared with controls, lower GI endoscopy was received by 1.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-1.8%) vs 4.7% (95% CI, 4.6%-4.9%). Screening was more frequent among patients with a recent history of screening (16.2% [95% CI, 15.4%-16.9%] of these patients had mammography, 14.7% [95% CI, 13.7%-15.6%] had a Papanicolaou test, 23.3% [95% CI, 22.6%-24.0%] had a PSA test, and 6.1% [95% CI, 5.2%-7.0%] had lower GI endoscopy).
conclusionA sizeable proportion of patients with advanced cancer continue to undergo cancer screening tests that do not have a meaningful likelihood of providing benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.