Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20940013›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmacology2011

Opioid receptors and the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in squirrel monkeys: Mu and delta opioid receptor mechanisms.

Donna M Platt, Kristen M Bano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discriminative Stimulus Effects and Metabolism of Ethanol in Rhesus Monkeys.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Delta Opioid Pharmacology in Relation to Alcohol Behaviors.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donna M PlattHarvard Medical School, New England Primate Research Center, One Pine Hill Drive, P.O. Box 9102, Southborough, MA 01772-9102, USA. donna_platt@hms.harvard.edu
Kristen M Bano
New England Biolabs (United States) · US

Funding

ZETA CHAIN OF T CELL RECEPTOR INTERACTS W/ NEF OF SIV &HIV2P51RR000168 · NCRR · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI JOHNSON, R. PAUL · 1985 to 2011
$139.3M
GABAa receptor subtype mechanisms in nonhuman primatesR01AA016179 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI PLATT, DONNA M · 2006 to 2016
$3.2M
MOUSE MODELS OF CANCER, BONE DISEASE, AND LACTATIONK26RR000168 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSOL, THOMAS J · 2000 to 2004
$547k
NCRR NIH HHS K26 RR000168NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000168NCRR NIH HHS RR00168NIAAA NIH HHS AA16179NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mu and delta opioid receptors modulate the reinforcing effects of ethanol, however, their role in the subjective effects of ethanol is not well understood. This study evaluated the contribution of mu and delta opioid receptors to the subjective effects of ethanol using drug discrimination procedures. Monkeys were trained to discriminate ethanol from saline under a schedule of food delivery. In tests, ethanol engendered increases in drug-lever responding, reaching a maximum of >80%. The mu opioid receptor agonists fentanyl and buprenorphine and the delta opioid receptor agonists SNC 80 and SNC 162 did not substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. As pretreatments, the full agonists fentanyl and SNC 80 enhanced the effects of low doses of ethanol and fentanyl attenuated the effects of the ethanol training dose. Although the possibility of pharmacological antagonism of the effects of ethanol cannot be ruled out, a more likely alternative is that the diminished effects of ethanol were due to perceptual masking of the ethanol stimulus. In contrast, the partial agonists buprenorphine and SNC 162 did not alter ethanol's effects. Finally, the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol were attenuated following administration of presumably mu-selective doses of the antagonist naltrexone, but not after administration of the delta opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole. The ability of naltrexone to block the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol likely reflects its capacity to attenuate ethanol-induced increases in endogenous opioids, in particular beta-endorphin, because attenuation of the ethanol stimulus was not accompanied by significant suppression of response rate.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, muSaimiriEthanolReceptors, Opioid, deltaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID20940013
PMCPMC2997855
OpenAlexW2064075017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.