Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20939945›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2010

Facilitating understanding of mental health problems in GP consultations: a qualitative study using taped-assisted recall.

John Cape, Connie Geyer, Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, Marta Buszewicz, Christopher Dowrick, Peter Salmon

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autism diagnosis as a social process.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 'She believed in me'. What patients with depression value in their relationship with practitioners. A secondary analysis of multiple qualitative data sets.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. 'I wouldn't push that further because I don't want to lose her': a multiperspective qualitative study of behaviour change for long-term conditions in primary care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  13. Therapeutic consultations for patients with depressive symptoms.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What we talk about when we talk about depression: doctor-patient conversations and treatment decision outcomes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John CapeCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London. j.cape@ucl.ac.uk
Connie Geyer
Chris Barker
Nancy Pistrang
Marta Buszewicz
Christopher Dowrick
Peter Salmon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems are common in primary care and most are managed solely by the GP. Patients strive to understand their mental health problems, and facilitating patients' understanding may be important in their care, yet little is known about this process in GP consultations.

aimTo explore how patients' understanding of common mental health problems is developed in GP consultations. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study.

settingTen general practices in North Central London.

methodFourteen patients and their GPs were interviewed using the taped-assisted recall (TAR) method, and asked how understanding of the patients' mental health problems had been discussed in a recent consultation. The resulting 42 transcripts of the GP-patient consultations and separate GP and patient TAR interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic and process analytic methods.

resultsPatients considered understanding their mental health problems to be important, and half reported their GP consultations as helpful in this respect. The process of coming to an understanding was predominantly patient-led. Patients suggested their own explanations, and these were facilitated and focused by the doctors' questioning, listening, validating, and elaborating aspects they considered important. Both doctors and patients experienced constraints on the extent to which developing understanding of problems was possible in GP consultations.

conclusionGPs can help patients understand their mental health problems by recognising patients' own attempts at explanation and helping to shape and develop these.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticePhysician-Patient RelationsProfessional PracticeAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTape RecordingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20939945
PMCPMC2965968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.