Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20937921›Full record

Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2010

Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension and reduction in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures.

Cynthia A Weber, Michael E Ernst, Genesis S Sezate, Shimin Zheng, Barry L Carter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00201045 (Collaborative Management of Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00201045 nacompletednot on this map

Collaborative Management of Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2003 to 2006Enrolled179ConditionsHypertensionArmsPhysician/Pharmacist Collaborative Teams
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Physician-pharmacist co-management and 24-hour blood pressure control.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cynthia A WeberDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242, USA.
Michael E Ernst
Genesis S Sezate
Shimin Zheng
Barry L Carter

Funding

Collaborative Management of HypertensionR01HL069801 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CARTER, BARRY L · 2003 to 2005
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1 R01 HL069801-01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension has been shown to improve office blood pressures (BPs). We sought to describe the effect of such a model on 24-hour ambulatory BPs.

methodsWe performed a prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial, enrolling 179 patients with uncontrolled hypertension from 5 primary care clinics in Iowa City, Iowa. Patients were randomized by clinic to receive pharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension (intervention) or usual care (control) for a 9-month period. In the intervention group, pharmacists helped patients to identify barriers to BP control, counseled on lifestyle and dietary modifications, and adjusted antihypertensive therapy in collaboration with the patients' primary care providers. Patients were seen by pharmacists a minimum of every 2 months. Ambulatory BP was measured at baseline and at study end.

resultsBaseline and end-of-study ambulatory BP profiles were evaluated for 175 patients. Mean (SD) ambulatory systolic BPs (SBPs), reported in millimeters of mercury, were reduced more in the intervention group than in the control group: daytime change in (Δ) SBP, 15.2 (11.5) vs 5.5 (13.5) (P < .001); nighttime ΔSBP, 12.2 (14.8) vs 3.4 (13.3) (P < .001); and 24-hour ΔSBP, 14.1 (11.3) vs 5.5 (12.5) (P < .001). More patients in the intervention group than in the control group had their BP controlled at the end of the study (75.0% vs 50.7%) (P < .001), as defined by overall 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring.

conclusionPharmacist-physician collaborative management of hypertension achieved consistent and significantly greater reduction in 24-hour BP and a high rate of BP control. Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00201045.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCircadian RhythmInterdisciplinary CommunicationPharmacistsPhysiciansAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertensionIowaMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20937921
PMCPMC2992979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.