Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20937476›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2010

Emerging roles for natural microRNA sponges.

Margaret S Ebert, Phillip A Sharp

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 266 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
266citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

266 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Potential Links Between ANRIL and MiRNAs in Various Cancers.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

206 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret S EbertDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Phillip A Sharp
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MATTHEW G. VANDER HEIDEN · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Stress and Proliferation States Impact MicroRNA-Mediated Regulation in CancerR01CA133404 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SHARP, PHILLIP A · 2008 to 2017
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS P30-CA14051NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133404NCI NIH HHS R01-CA133404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a non-coding RNA expressed from a human pseudogene was reported to regulate the corresponding protein-coding mRNA by acting as a decoy for microRNAs (miRNAs) that bind to common sites in the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). It was proposed that competing for miRNAs might be a general activity of pseudogenes. This study raises questions about the potential ability of thousands of non-coding transcripts to interact with miRNAs and influence the expression of miRNA target genes. Three years ago, artificial miRNA decoys termed 'miRNA sponges' were introduced as a means to create loss-of-function phenotypes for miRNA families in cell culture and in virally infected tissue and transgenic animals. Given the efficacy of miRNA sponges expressed from stable chromosomal insertions, it seemed plausible that natural non-coding RNAs might have evolved to sequence-specifically sequester miRNAs. The first such endogenous sponge RNA was discovered in plants and found to attenuate a miRNA-mediated response to an environmental stress. More recently, a viral non-coding RNA was observed to sequester and promote the degradation of a cellular miRNA in infected primate cells. In this review we discuss the potential and proven roles for endogenous miRNA sponges and consider some criteria for screening candidate sponge RNAs.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsRNA, Untranslated3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsHumansPseudogenesRNA, MessengerRNA, Viral3' Untranslated RegionsMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20937476
PMCPMC4070712
OpenAlexW1504052604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.