Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20937349›Full record

ArticleToxicology2011

Development of an in vitro alternative assay method for vaginal irritation.

Seyoum Ayehunie, Chris Cannon, Karen Larosa, Jeffrey Pudney, Deborah J Anderson, Mitchell Klausner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seyoum AyehunieMatTek Corporation, 200 Homer Avenue, Ashland, MA 01721, USA. sayehunie@mattek.com
Chris Cannon
Karen Larosa
Jeffrey Pudney
Deborah J Anderson
Mitchell Klausner
MatTek Corporation (United States) · USBoston University · USAshland (United States) · US

Funding

Vaginal/cervical tissue models: endocrine effects and susceptibility to infectionU01AI070914 · NIAID · MATTEK CORPORATION · PI AYEHUNIE, SEYOUM · 2006 to 2010
$3.4M
Validation of a Human In Vitro Vaginal Irritation TestR43HD050023 · NICHD · MATTEK CORPORATION · PI AYEHUNIE, SEYOUM · 2007 to 2007
$212k
NIAID NIH HHS 5U01AI070914NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI070914NICHD NIH HHS 2 R43 HD050023NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD050023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vaginal mucosa is commonly exposed to chemicals and therapeutic agents that may result in irritation and/or inflammation. In addition to acute effects, vaginal irritation and inflammation can make women more susceptible to infections such as HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2). Hence, the vaginal irritation potential of feminine care formulations and vaginally administered therapeutic agents is a significant public health concern. Traditionally, testing of such materials has been performed using the rabbit vaginal irritation (RVI) assay. In the current study, we investigated whether the organotypic, highly differentiated EpiVaginal™ tissue could be used as a non-animal alternative to the RVI test. The EpiVaginal tissue was exposed to a single application of ingredients commonly found in feminine hygiene products and the effects on tissue viability (MTT assay), barrier disruption (measured by transepithelial electrical resistance, TEER and sodium fluorescein (NaFl) leakage), and inflammatory cytokine release (interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) patterns were examined. When compared to untreated controls, two irritating ingredients, nonoxynol 9 and benzalkonium chloride, reduced tissue viability to <40% and TEER to <60% while increasing NaFl leakage by 11-24% and IL-1α and IL-1β release by >100%. Four other non-irritating materials had minimal effects on these parameters. Assay reproducibility was confirmed by testing the chemicals using three different tissue production lots and by using tissues reconstructed from cells obtained from three different donors. Coefficients of variation between tissue lots reconstructed with cells obtained from the same donor or lots reconstructed with cells obtained from different donors were less than 10% and 12%, respectively. In conclusion, decreases in tissue viability and barrier function and increases in IL-1α and IL-1β release appear to be useful endpoints for preclinical screening of topically applied chemicals and formulations for their vaginal irritation potential.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesBenzalkonium CompoundsCytokinesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansInflammationInflammation MediatorsIrritantsMucous MembraneNonoxynolRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsBenzalkonium CompoundsCytokinesInflammation MediatorsIrritantsNonoxynol

Identifiers

PMID20937349
PMCPMC3003762
OpenAlexW2066118072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.