Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20937136›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2010

Brain size and brain/intracranial volume ratio in major mental illness.

Martin Reite, Erik Reite, Dan Collins, Peter Teale, Donald C Rojas, Elliot Sandberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuron-based heredity and human evolution.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin ReiteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora CO, USA. martin.reite@ucdenver.edu
Erik Reite
Dan Collins
Peter Teale
Donald C Rojas
Elliot Sandberg

Funding

MEG EVOKED IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH047476 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REITE, MARTIN · 1991 to 2008
$2.1M
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF AUDITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH060214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ROJAS, DONALD C. · 1999 to 2008
$1.8M
The Brain &Psychosis: Asymmetry &cortical organizationR01MH064502 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REITE, MARTIN · 2001 to 2005
$1.8M
Parsing the schizophrenia-bipolar spectrum: an MEG based schizoaffective endophenRC1MH088623 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REITE, MARTIN · 2009 to 2010
$956k
NIMH NIH HHS MH 088623NIMH NIH HHS MH47476NIMH NIH HHS MH64502NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper summarizes the findings of a long term study addressing the question of how several brain volume measure are related to three major mental illnesses in a Colorado subject group. It reports results obtained from a large N, collected and analyzed by the same laboratory over a multiyear period, with visually guided MRI segmentation being the primary initial analytic tool.

methodsIntracerebral volume (ICV), total brain volume (TBV), ventricular volume (VV), ventricular/brain ratio (VBR), and TBV/ICV ratios were calculated from a total of 224 subject MRIs collected over a period of 13 years. Subject groups included controls (C, N = 89), and patients with schizophrenia (SZ, N = 58), bipolar disorder (BD, N = 51), and schizoaffective disorder (SAD, N = 26).

resultsICV, TBV, and VV measures compared favorably with values obtained by other research groups, but in this study did not differ significantly between groups. TBV/ICV ratios were significantly decreased, and VBR increased, in the SZ and BD groups compared to the C group. The SAD group did not differ from C on any measure.

conclusionsIn this study TBV/ICV and VBR ratios separated SZ and BD patients from controls. Of interest however, SAD patients did not differ from controls on these measures. The findings suggest that the gross measure of TBV may not reliably differ in the major mental illnesses to a degree useful in diagnosis, likely due to the intrinsic variability of the measures in question; the differences in VBR appear more robust across studies. Differences in some of these findings compared to earlier reports from several laboratories finding significant differences between groups in VV and TBV may relate to phenomenological drift, differences in analytic techniques, and possibly the "file drawer problem".

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAtrophyBipolar DisorderBrainCerebral VentriclesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental DisordersOrgan SizePsychotic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20937136
PMCPMC2958994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.