Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20936671›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2010

PCRless library mutagenesis via oligonucleotide recombination in yeast.

Nathan Pirakitikulr, Nili Ostrov, Pamela Peralta-Yahya, Virginia W Cornish

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TargetedACS synthetic biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Beyond Antibodies as Binding Partners: The Role of Antibody Mimetics in Bioanalysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Directed evolution of unspecific peroxygenase from Agrocybe aegerita.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014
    Article
  7. Molecular tools for chemical biotechnology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Technologies of directed protein evolution in vivo.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan PirakitikulrDepartment of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Nili Ostrov
Pamela Peralta-Yahya
Virginia W Cornish
Columbia University · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
A Genetic Screen for Protein Evolution and ProteomicsR01GM062867 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI CORNISH, VIRGINIA W · 2002 to 2010
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62867NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The directed evolution of biomolecules with new functions is largely performed in vitro, with PCR mutagenesis followed by high-throughput assays for desired activities. As synthetic biology creates impetus for generating biomolecules that function in living cells, new technologies are needed for performing mutagenesis and selection for directed evolution in vivo. Homologous recombination, routinely exploited for targeted gene alteration, is an attractive tool for in vivo library mutagenesis, yet surprisingly is not routinely used for this purpose. Here, we report the design and characterization of a yeast-based system for library mutagenesis of protein loops via oligonucleotide recombination. In this system, a linear vector is co-transformed with single-stranded mutagenic oligonucleotides. Using repair of nonsense codons engineered in three different active-site loops in the selectable marker TRP1 as a model system, we first optimized the recombination efficiency. Single-loop recombination was highly efficient, averaging 5%, or 4.0×10(5) recombinants. Multiple loops could be simultaneously mutagenized, although the efficiencies dropped to 0.2%, or 6.0×10(3) recombinants, for two loops and 0.01% efficiency, or 1.5×10(2) recombinants, for three loops. Finally, the utility of this system for directed evolution was tested explicitly by selecting functional variants from a mock library of 1:10(6) wild-type:nonsense codons. Sequencing showed that oligonucleotide recombination readily covered this large library, mutating not only the target codon but also encoded silent mutations on either side of the library cassette. Together these results establish oligonucleotide recombination as a simple and powerful library mutagenesis technique and advance efforts to engineer the cell for fully in vivo directed evolution.

Indexed as

MutagenesisOligonucleotidesRecombination, GeneticYeastsOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID20936671
PMCPMC3009401
OpenAlexW2119002378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.