Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20936528›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2010

Iron intake and markers of iron status and risk of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Mark G O'Doherty, Christian C Abnet, Liam J Murray, Jayne V Woodside, Lesley A Anderson, John D Brockman, Marie M Cantwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review: Experimental models for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2012
    Review
  8. Heme iron from meat and risk of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and stomach.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark G O'DohertyCancer Epidemiology Health Services Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, Mulhouse Building, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, UK. m.odoherty@qub.ac.uk
Christian C Abnet
Liam J Murray
Jayne V Woodside
Lesley A Anderson
John D Brockman
Marie M Cantwell
Queen's University Belfast · GBNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer StudiesZIACP000185 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ABNET, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2025
$25.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP000185NCI NIH HHS Y99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between iron intake and iron status with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

methodsA total of 220 BE patients, 224 EAC patients, and 256 frequency-matched controls completed a lifestyle and food frequency questionnaire and provided serum and toenail samples between 2002 and 2005. Using multiple logistic regression, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated within quartiles of intake/status.

resultsComparing the fourth to the first quartile, ferritin (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.97) and transferrin saturation (OR 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.82) were negatively associated with BE; while total iron binding capacity was positively associated per 50 μg/dl increment (OR 1.47; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.92). Comparing the fourth to the first quartile, iron intake (OR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.98), non-heme iron intake per 10 mg/day increment (OR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.99), and toenail iron (OR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.93) were negatively associated with EAC; while heme iron intake was positively associated (OR 3.11 95% CI: 1.46, 6.61). PRINCIPAL

conclusionIn contrast to the hypothesis that increased iron intakes and higher iron stores are a risk factor for BE and EAC, this study suggests that higher iron intakes and stores may have a protective association with BE and EAC, with the exception of what was found for heme iron intake.

Indexed as

EatingIron, DietaryAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBarrett EsophagusBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersIron, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID20936528
PMCPMC3438890
OpenAlexW1997552265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.