Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20936474›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics2011

Introduction of large DNA inserts into the barley pathogenic fungus, Ustilago hordei, via recombined binary BAC vectors and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Shawkat Ali, Guus Bakkeren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shawkat AliPacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, BC, Canada.
Guus Bakkeren
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic transformation of organisms with large genome fragments containing complete genes, with regulatory elements or clusters of genes, can contribute to the functional analysis of such genes. However, large inserts, such as those found on bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, are often not easy to transfer. We exploited an existing technique to convert BAC clones, containing genomic DNA fragments from the barley-covered smut fungus Ustilago hordei to binary BACs (BIBACs) to make them transferable by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA transfer machinery. Genetic transformation of U. hordei with BAC clones using polyethylene glycol or electroporation is difficult. As a proof of concept, two BAC clones were successfully converted into BIBAC vectors and transferred by A. tumefaciens into U. hordei and U. maydis, the related corn smut fungi. Molecular analysis of the transformants showed that the T-DNA containing the BAC clones with their inserts was stably integrated into the U. hordei genome. A transformation frequency of approximately 10⁻⁴ was achieved both for U. hordei sporidia and protoplasts; the efficiencies were 25-30 times higher for U. maydis. The combination of in vivo recombineering technology for BAC clones and A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Ustilago species should pave the way for functional genomics studies.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA, RecombinantGenetic VectorsRhizobiumUstilagoDNA, BacterialDNA, Recombinant

Identifiers

PMID20936474
OpenAlexW2140056263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.