ArticleCurrent genetics2011
Introduction of large DNA inserts into the barley pathogenic fungus, Ustilago hordei, via recombined binary BAC vectors and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
Article in Current genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- FungalBraid 2.0: expanding the synthetic biology toolbox for the biotechnological exploitation of filamentous fungi.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- An assessment of transgenomics as a tool for gene discovery in Populus euphratica Oliv.Plant molecular biology · 2018Article
- Pathogen Trojan Horse Delivers Bioactive Host Protein to Alter Maize Anther Cell Behavior in Situ.The Plant cell · 2018Article
- A silver bullet in a golden age of functional genomics: the impact ofFungal biology and biotechnology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic transformation of organisms with large genome fragments containing complete genes, with regulatory elements or clusters of genes, can contribute to the functional analysis of such genes. However, large inserts, such as those found on bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, are often not easy to transfer. We exploited an existing technique to convert BAC clones, containing genomic DNA fragments from the barley-covered smut fungus Ustilago hordei to binary BACs (BIBACs) to make them transferable by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA transfer machinery. Genetic transformation of U. hordei with BAC clones using polyethylene glycol or electroporation is difficult. As a proof of concept, two BAC clones were successfully converted into BIBAC vectors and transferred by A. tumefaciens into U. hordei and U. maydis, the related corn smut fungi. Molecular analysis of the transformants showed that the T-DNA containing the BAC clones with their inserts was stably integrated into the U. hordei genome. A transformation frequency of approximately 10⁻⁴ was achieved both for U. hordei sporidia and protoplasts; the efficiencies were 25-30 times higher for U. maydis. The combination of in vivo recombineering technology for BAC clones and A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Ustilago species should pave the way for functional genomics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.