Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20936301›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2011

Capecitabine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Wei Ling, Jie Fan, Yue Ma, Yuan Ma, Hongxia Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Chemical-Genetic Interactions ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Capecitabine in the management of colorectal cancer.Cancer management and research · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei LingDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China.
Jie Fan
Yue Ma
Yuan Ma
Hongxia Wang
Renji Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) remains a significant public health concern. The objectives of present study are to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in the treatment of MCRC. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a computerized search using combinations of the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "Xeloda," "chemotherapy," "capecitabine," or "5-fluorouracil."

resultsTreatment with capecitabine chemotherapy was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (WMD = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.04-2.44; P = 0.04), whereas overall survival was not statistically significant (WMD [random] = 0.29; P = 0.75). Patients in both capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil groups had equal 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12, P = 0.21; OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.15, P = 0.27; OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.78-2.05, P = 0.34; respectively). The analysis also demonstrates that the response rate of capecitabine-based chemotherapy was comparable to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (OR = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.90-1.14; P = 0.80). When comparing single-agent capecitabine against 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, our results showed an overall OR of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.16-2.09) in favor of the capecitabine arm. When toxicity was evaluated, a statistically significant benefit with capecitabine-based therapy was seen, especially for grade 3/4 neutropenia (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91; P = 0.00005).

conclusionsCapecitabine-based chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly superior progression-free survival, equivalent overall survival, and comparable response rate with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. These observations support the use of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in the treatment of MCRC as a first-line or as a neoadjuvant modality.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCamptothecinCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFluorouracilIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID20936301
PMCPMC11828214
OpenAlexW1998442706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.