SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2011
Capecitabine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of gemcitabine containing chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2011Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Herbal Medicine for Leukopenia/Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Adults with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Chemotherapy with or without autologous cytokine-induced killer cell transfusion as the first-line treatment for stage IV gastrointestinal cancer: a phase II clinical trial.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2016Trial
- Chemical-Genetic Interactions ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Clinical effects of autologous dendritic cells combined with cytokine-induced killer cells followed by chemotherapy in treating patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective study.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016Article
- Retrospective comparative study of the effects of dendritic cell vaccine and cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone and in combination for colorectal cancer.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Effectiveness and safety of s-1-based therapy compared with 5-Fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2014Review
- 5-Fluorouracil or capecitabine in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a pooled-analysis of randomized trials.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2012Review
- Capecitabine in the management of colorectal cancer.Cancer management and research · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMetastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) remains a significant public health concern. The objectives of present study are to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in the treatment of MCRC. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a computerized search using combinations of the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "Xeloda," "chemotherapy," "capecitabine," or "5-fluorouracil."
resultsTreatment with capecitabine chemotherapy was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (WMD = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.04-2.44; P = 0.04), whereas overall survival was not statistically significant (WMD [random] = 0.29; P = 0.75). Patients in both capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil groups had equal 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.59-1.12, P = 0.21; OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61-1.15, P = 0.27; OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.78-2.05, P = 0.34; respectively). The analysis also demonstrates that the response rate of capecitabine-based chemotherapy was comparable to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (OR = 1.02, 95% CI, 0.90-1.14; P = 0.80). When comparing single-agent capecitabine against 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, our results showed an overall OR of 1.56 (95% CI, 1.16-2.09) in favor of the capecitabine arm. When toxicity was evaluated, a statistically significant benefit with capecitabine-based therapy was seen, especially for grade 3/4 neutropenia (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91; P = 0.00005).
conclusionsCapecitabine-based chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly superior progression-free survival, equivalent overall survival, and comparable response rate with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. These observations support the use of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in the treatment of MCRC as a first-line or as a neoadjuvant modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.