Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20935632›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2010

Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis.

Yoshitami Hashimoto, Arnab Ray Chaudhuri, Massimo Lopes, Vincenzo Costanzo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 358 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
358citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

358 citing papers in PubMed, 542 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The RecBC complex protects single-stranded DNA gaps during lesion bypass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

298 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshitami HashimotoLondon Research Institute, South Mimms, Hertfordshire, UK.
Arnab Ray Chaudhuri
Massimo Lopes
Vincenzo Costanzo
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

Cancer Research UK A15668Cancer Research UK A7124European Research Council 206281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of Rad51 in an unperturbed cell cycle has been difficult to distinguish from its DNA repair function. Here, using EM to visualize replication intermediates assembled in Xenopus laevis egg extract, we show that Rad51 is required to prevent the accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps at replication forks and behind them. ssDNA gaps at forks arise from extended uncoupling of leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis. In contrast, ssDNA gaps behind forks, which are prevalent on damaged templates, result from Mre11-dependent degradation of newly synthesized DNA strands and are suppressed by inhibition of Mre11 nuclease activity. These findings reveal direct roles for Rad51 at replication forks, demonstrating that Rad51 protects newly synthesized DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationDNA, Single-StrandedMRE11 Homologue ProteinProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRad51 RecombinaseXenopus laevisXenopus ProteinsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedMRE11 Homologue ProteinMre11 protein, XenopusProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRAD51 protein, XenopusRad51 RecombinaseXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20935632
PMCPMC4306207
OpenAlexW2146533600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.