Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20935290›Full record

SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2011

A meta-analysis of leukaemia risk from protracted exposure to low-dose gamma radiation.

R D Daniels, M K Schubauer-Berigan

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chernobyl cleanup workers from Estonia: follow-up for cancer incidence and mortality.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R D DanielsDivision of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4676 Columbia Pkwy, R-14, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA. RTD2@CDC.gov
M K Schubauer-Berigan
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMore than 400,000 workers annually receive a measurable radiation dose and may be at increased risk of radiation-induced leukaemia. It is unclear whether leukaemia risk is elevated with protracted, low-dose exposure.

objectiveWe conducted a meta-analysis examining the relationship between protracted low-dose ionising radiation exposure and leukaemia. DATA SOURCES: Reviews by the National Academies and United Nations provided a summary of informative studies published before 2005. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for additional occupational and environmental studies published between 2005 and 2009. STUDY SELECTION: We selected 23 studies that: (1) examined the association between protracted exposures to ionising radiation and leukaemia excluding chronic lymphocytic subtype; (2) were a cohort or nested case-control design without major bias; (3) reported quantitative estimates of exposure; and (4) conducted exposure-response analyses using relative or excess RR per unit exposure.

methodsStudies were further screened to reduce information overlap. Random effects models were developed to summarise between-study variance and obtain an aggregate estimate of the excess RR at 100 mGy. Publication bias was assessed by trim and fill and Rosenthal's file drawer methods.

resultsWe found an ERR at 100 mGy of 0.19 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.32) by modelling results from 10 studies and adjusting for publication bias. Between-study variance was not evident (p=0.99).

conclusionsProtracted exposure to low-dose gamma radiation is significantly associated with leukaemia. Our estimate agreed well with the leukaemia risk observed among exposed adults in the Life Span Study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors, providing increased confidence in the current understanding of leukaemia risk from ionising radiation. However, unlike the estimates obtained from the LSS, our model provides a precise, quantitative summary of the direct estimates of excess risk from studies of protracted radiation exposures.

Indexed as

Gamma RaysHumansLeukemia, Radiation-InducedModels, StatisticalNuclear ReactorsOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePublication BiasRadiation Dosage

Identifiers

PMID20935290
PMCPMC3095477
OpenAlexW2103931782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.