Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20935119›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Evidence of distinct populations and specific subpopulations within the species Oenococcus oeni.

Julen Bridier, Olivier Claisse, Monika Coton, Emmanuel Coton, Aline Lonvaud-Funel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative genomic analysis of 255Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  2. Genomic Analysis of an Excellent Wine-Making StrainPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Multilocus Sequence Typing ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Distribution of Oenococcus oeni populations in natural habitats.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the Physiological Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julen BridierISVV, UMR Oenologie 1219, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 210 Chemin de Leysotte CS 50008, 33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Olivier Claisse
Monika Coton
Emmanuel Coton
Aline Lonvaud-Funel
Unité de Recherche Œnologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) present in the oenological microbial ecosystem, Oenococcus oeni, an acidophilic lactic acid bacterium, is essential during winemaking. It outclasses all other bacterial species during malolactic fermentation (MLF). Oenological performances, such as malic acid degradation rate and sensorial impact, vary significantly according to the strain. The genetic diversity of the O. oeni species was evaluated using a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme. Seven housekeeping genes were sequenced for a collection of 258 strains that had been isolated all over the world (particularly Burgundy, Champagne, and Aquitaine, France, Chile, South Africa, and Italy) and in several wine types (red wines, white wines, and champagne) and cider. The allelic diversity was high, with an average of 20.7 alleles per locus, many of them being rare alleles. The collection comprised 127 sequence types, suggesting an important genotypic diversity. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from the concatenated sequence of the seven housekeeping genes showed two major phylogenetic groups, named A and B. One unique strain isolated from cider composed a third group, rooting the phylogenetic tree. However, all other strains isolated from cider were in group B. Eight phylogenetic subgroups were statistically differentiated and could be delineated by the analysis of only 32 mutations instead of the 600 mutations observed in the concatenated sequence of the seven housekeeping genes. Interestingly, in group A, several phylogenetic subgroups were composed mostly of strains coming from a precise geographic origin. Three subgroups were identified, composed of strains from Chile, South Africa, and eastern France.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationChileCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialFranceGenotypeItalyMolecular Sequence DataMultilocus Sequence TypingOenococcusPhylogenySequence HomologySouth AfricaWineDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20935119
PMCPMC2988583
OpenAlexW2110866621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.