Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20934941›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2011

Using a rapid communication approach to improve a POC Chlamydia test.

Elizabeth A Hesse, Sabre A Patton, Jill S Huppert, Charlotte A Gaydos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A HesseCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. elizabeth.hesse@cchmc.org
Sabre A Patton
Jill S Huppert
Charlotte A Gaydos

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Hamill · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
Short Term Medical Student Training GrantT35DK060444 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI JASON T BLACKARD · 2002 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1U54 EB007958NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK060444PHS HHS K23 A1063182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection in young women. Available point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests perform poorly, but development of new devices can be costly and time consuming. We explored the feasibility (user friendliness) and test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of a new prototype device to detect Chlamydia in adolescent women by using small numbers of subjects and rapid communication with the manufacturer. We compared cervical POC test results to the gold standard (cervical nucleic acid amplification testing). We also assessed the accuracy of the POC test on self-collected vaginal swabs by comparing results to cervical nucleic acid amplification test and to the cervical POC test. We frequently reviewed user experience and test results with the manufacturer. The results showed the feasibility and accuracy of the device. Feasibility--initial device malfunctions were identified and corrected. This device would be easy to use in a nonclinical setting, as it is self-contained and the color change for some specimens was dramatic and immediate. Accuracy--initial prototypes demonstrated low sensitivities (38%) for vaginal and cervical swabs. After feedback, the company developed new prototypes with improved sensitivity (80%). However, the increased sensitivity was accompanied by a high percentage of indeterminate results and false positives that lowered specificity.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAdultBacteriological TechniquesCervix UteriChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisDNA, BacterialFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSpecimen HandlingVaginaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20934941
PMCPMC3187614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.