Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20934270›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2011

The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704.

Timothy N Showalter, Kathryn A Winter, Adam C Berger, William F Regine, Ross A Abrams, Howard Safran, John P Hoffman, Al B Benson, John S MacDonald, Christopher G Willett

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00003216 (A Phase III Study of Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Pre and Post Chemoradiation Gemcitabine for Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00003216 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Study of Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Pre and Post Chemoradiation Gemcitabine for Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadiation Therapy Oncology GroupRan1998Enrolled518ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsfluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride, radiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recurrence patterns of pancreatic cancer treated with adjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Timothy N ShowalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Kathryn A Winter
Adam C Berger
William F Regine
Ross A Abrams
Howard Safran
John P Hoffman
Al B Benson
John S MacDonald
Christopher G Willett

Funding

RTOG Foreign AccrualU10CA021661 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI CURRAN, WALTER J. · 1985 to 2013
$150.3M
RTOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037422 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI BRUNER, DEBORAH WATKINS · 1985 to 2013
$30.4M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE (MCTS) PROGRAM (UL1)UL1RR025741 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 2008 to 2011
$24.7M
RADIATION THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP-STATISTICAL UNIT GRANTU10CA032115 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SADEK, RAMSES · 1985 to 2008
$9.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA021661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032115NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037422NCI NIH HHS U10 CA21661NCI NIH HHS U10 CA32115NCI NIH HHS U10 CA37422NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLymph node status is an important predictor of survival in pancreatic cancer. We performed a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9704, an adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation trial, to determine the influence of lymph node factors--number of positive nodes (NPN), total nodes examined (TNE), and lymph node ratio (LNR ratio of NPN to TNE)--on OS and disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENT AND

methodsEligible patients from RTOG 9704 form the basis of this secondary analysis of lymph node parameters. Actuarial estimates for OS and DFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate associations of NPN, TNE, and LNR with OS and DFS. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were also performed.

resultsThere were 538 patients enrolled in the RTOG 9704 trial. Of these, 445 patients were eligible with lymph nodes removed. Overall median NPN was 1 (min-max, 0-18). Increased NPN was associated with worse OS (HR=1.06, p=0.001) and DFS (HR=1.05, p=0.01). In multivariate analyses, both NPN and TNE were associated with OS and DFS. TNE>12, and >15 were associated with increased OS for all patients, but not for node-negative patients (n=142). Increased LNR was associated with worse OS (HR=1.01, p<0.0001) and DFS (HR=1.006, p=0.002).

conclusionIn patients who undergo surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, TNE, NPN, and LNR are associated with OS and DFS. This secondary analysis of a prospective, cooperative group trial supports the influence of these lymph node parameters on outcomes after surgery and adjuvant therapy using contemporary techniques.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID20934270
PMCPMC3038247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.