Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20934213›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2010

Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit.

J Randall Curtis, Jean-Louis Vincent

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07327450 (Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07327450 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Coaching Doctors and Nurses to Improve Ethical Decision-making in Team: a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial in 10 Departments of the Ghent University Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GhentRan2026 to 2028Enrolled360ConditionsDecision Making ,Shared, Leadership, End of Life Communication, End of Life Decision MakingArmsUsual Care Group, CODE II intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J Randall CurtisDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center; University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA. jrc@u.washington.edu
Jean-Louis Vincent
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Randomized trial of an interdisciplinary communication intervention to improve paR01NR005226 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURTIS, J RANDALL, ENGELBERG, RUTH ANN · 1999 to 2012
$6.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01NR-05226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensive care unit (ICU) is where patients are given some of the most technologically advanced life-sustaining treatments, and where difficult decisions are made about the usefulness of such treatments. The substantial regional variability in these ethical decisions is a result of many factors, including religious and cultural beliefs. Because most critically ill patients lack the capacity to make decisions, family and other individuals often act as the surrogate decision makers, and in many regions communication between the clinician and family is central to decision making in the ICU. Elsewhere, involvement of the family is reduced and that of the physicians is increased. End-of-life care is associated with increased burnout and distress among clinicians working in the ICU. Since many deaths in the ICU are preceded by a decision to withhold or withdraw life support, high-quality decision making and end-of-life care are essential in all regions, and can improve patient and family outcomes, and also retention of clinicians working in the ICU. To make such a decision requires adequate training, good communication between the clinician and family, and the collaboration of a well functioning interdisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsTerminal CareAdultCommunicationDecision MakingHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient AdmissionProfessional-Family RelationsResource AllocationWithholding Treatment

Identifiers

PMID20934213
OpenAlexW1975344296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.