Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20932976›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011

Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry.

Gevorg Grigoryan, William F Degrado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Designability of α-Helical Protein Filaments.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Design principles of the common Gly-X6-Gly membrane protein building block.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Parametrically guided design of beta barrels and transmembrane nanopores using deep learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Design of a water-soluble CD20 antigen with computational epitope scaffolding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The proteins that could be.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gevorg GrigoryanDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. gevorg@alum.mit.edu
William F Degrado

Funding

Understanding transmembrane helix interaction on the structural levelF32GM084631 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRIGORYAN, GEVORG · 2009 to 2010
$72k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM084631-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS 5F32GM084631-02NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM084631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the space of folded protein structures is highly degenerate, with recurring secondary and tertiary motifs, methods for representing protein structure in terms of collective physically relevant coordinates are of great interest. By collapsing structural diversity to a handful of parameters, such methods can be used to delineate the space of designable structures (i.e., conformations that can be stabilized with a large number of sequences)-a crucial task for de novo protein design. We first demonstrate this on natural α-helical coiled coils using the Crick parameterization. We show that over 95% of known coiled-coil structures are within  1-Å C(α) root mean square deviation of a Crick-ideal backbone. Derived parameters show that natural geometric space of coiled coils is highly restricted and can be represented by "allowed" conformations amidst a potential continuum of conformers. Allowed structures have (1) restricted axial offsets between helices, which differ starkly between parallel and anti-parallel structures; (2) preferred superhelical radii, which depend linearly on the oligomerization state; (3) pronounced radius-dependent a- and d-position amino acid propensities; and (4) discrete angles of rotation of helices about their axes, which are surprisingly independent of oligomerization state or orientation. In all, we estimate the space of designable coiled-coil structures to be reduced at least 160-fold relative to the space of geometrically feasible structures. To extend the benefits of structural parameterization to other systems, we developed a general mathematical framework for parameterizing arbitrary helical structures, which reduces to the Crick parameterization as a special case. The method is successfully validated on a set of non-coiled-coil helical bundles, frequent in channels and transporter proteins, which show significant helix bending but not supercoiling. Programs for coiled-coil parameter fitting and structure generation are provided via a web interface at http://www.gevorggrigoryan.com/cccp/, and code for generalized helical parameterization is available upon request.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularBacterial ProteinsDatabases, ProteinMembrane ProteinsProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryBacterial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20932976
PMCPMC3052747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.